White House Addresses Access to Reproductive Health Care, Including Abortion, in Second Post-Dobbs Executive Order | Practical Law

White House Addresses Access to Reproductive Health Care, Including Abortion, in Second Post-Dobbs Executive Order | Practical Law

The White House has issued a second executive order addressing actions the administration is taking to promote access to reproductive health care in response to the Supreme Court's recent Dobbs ruling on abortion. Among other topics, the second executive order announces a policy of supporting women's ability to access reproductive health care by traveling to seek abortion care in states where it is legal.

White House Addresses Access to Reproductive Health Care, Including Abortion, in Second Post-Dobbs Executive Order

by Practical Law Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
Published on 04 Aug 2022USA (National/Federal)
The White House has issued a second executive order addressing actions the administration is taking to promote access to reproductive health care in response to the Supreme Court's recent Dobbs ruling on abortion. Among other topics, the second executive order announces a policy of supporting women's ability to access reproductive health care by traveling to seek abortion care in states where it is legal.
The White House has issued a second executive order addressing actions the administration is taking to promote access to reproductive and other health care services (Executive Order (Aug. 3, 2022)). The administration's second order:
For more information on the Dobbs ruling, see:

HHS's Response to Dobbs Ruling

The administration's second order reviews recent actions taken by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in response to Dobbs. For example, in July HHS issued guidance to retail pharmacies concerning their obligations under federal civil rights laws to ensure equal access to comprehensive reproductive and other health care services, including for women who are experiencing miscarriages. These federal laws include:
HHS also recently clarified the obligations of hospitals and health providers, under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) (42 U.S.C. § 1395dd), to provide stabilizing care, including abortion, to patients presenting at an emergency department with an emergency medical condition—if that care is necessary to stabilize the individual's emergency medical condition. For more information, see Practice Note, The Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA): Overview and Surprise Medical Billing for Health Plans, Health Insurers, and Health Care Providers and Facilities Toolkit.
According to the administration, however, some states' restrictive abortion laws have resulted in legal uncertainty and disparate access to reproductive health care services. The second order describes situations in which:
  • Women have experienced delays in (or denials of) life-saving emergency care due to health providers' concerns over potential legal reprisal.
  • Women of reproductive age have been denied prescription medication at pharmacies, including medication for treating stomach ulcers, lupus, arthritis, and cancer, due to concerns that these medications (some of which can be used in medication abortions) could be used to terminate a pregnancy.
  • A health provider, citing a state's law restricting abortion, temporarily stopped providing emergency contraception. (Regarding July 2022 tri-agency guidance concerning the provision of emergency contraception under the ACA's contraceptives rules, see Practice Note, Contraceptives Coverage Under the ACA.)

Administration's Policy Supports Seeking Abortion Care In Other States

The administration's second order announces a general policy of supporting women's access to reproductive health care, including the ability to seek abortion care in states where it is legal (see Article, Group Health Plan Coverage Considerations for Employers After the Overturning of Roe v. Wade: Adding Travel and Lodging Benefits Under an Existing Group Health Plan). Accordingly, the administration's second order:
  • Defines "reproductive healthcare services" to mean medical, surgical, counseling, or referral services relating to the human reproductive system, including services relating to pregnancy or the termination of pregnancy.
  • Instructs HHS to advance access to reproductive health care services, including as permitted by federal law, through Medicaid for individuals traveling across state lines for medical care.
The second order also directs HHS to promote compliance with federal nondiscrimination laws by health providers that receive federal financial assistance, to ensure that individuals are not denied necessary health care on grounds protected by federal law, including:
  • Current or past pregnancy.
  • Potential or intended pregnancy.
  • Other medical conditions.
In this regard, the administration's second order states that HHS may consider:
  • Providing technical assistance to health providers regarding federal nondiscrimination laws.
  • Issuing additional guidance (and taking other action) in response to complaints of noncompliance with federal nondiscrimination laws.
  • Evaluating the adequacy of data collection and analysis at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institutes of Health (NIH), and other HHS agencies regarding the effect of access to reproductive health care on maternal health and other health outcomes.

Practical Impact

Some employer/plan sponsors may note with interest the administration's announced policy of supporting women's ability to seek abortion care in states where it is legal. However, the second order does not directly address Dobbs-related legal concerns for offering such benefits raised by employers, many of which are providing travel benefits at centers of excellence (or for services provided outside a set distance) for abortion and other services through their major medical plans. For example, some employers would like the administration to issue guidance addressing the extent to which (if at all) they will be shielded from liability, under ERISA preemption principles, for providing abortion-related travel and lodging reimbursements post-Dobbs. For more information, see Article, ERISA Preemption and Post-Dobbs Abortion Coverage for Employer-Sponsored Health Plans.