Federal Agency Unfair Labor Practices (ULPs) Under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS) Chart | Practical Law

Federal Agency Unfair Labor Practices (ULPs) Under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS) Chart | Practical Law

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, Federal Agency Unfair Labor Practices (ULPs) Under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS) Chart, Legal Forms

Federal Agency Unfair Labor Practices (ULPs) Under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS) Chart

by Practical Law Labor & Employment
MaintainedUSA (National/Federal)
A Chart setting out agency unfair labor practices (ULPs) under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS). The chart identifies Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) and federal court decisions addressing if an agency committed a ULP in violation of the FSLMRS.
The Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS) provides federal employees with the right without penalty or reprisal to:
  • Form a union.
  • Join a union.
  • Assist a union.
  • Refrain from forming, joining, or assisting a union.
Employee protected activities under the FSLMRS include:
  • Holding union leadership positions.
  • Filing, processing, and pursuing grievances.
  • Assisting in union organizational campaigns.
  • Engaging in union solicitation activities.
  • Seeking union assistance, pursuing grievances, and obtaining union representation.
  • Exercising or asserting rights under the collective bargaining agreement (CBA).
  • Discussing the CBA and other representational matters at work during non-work time without disrupting work.
  • Publicizing matters for the union.
  • Generally wearing union insignia.
An agency commits an unfair labor practice (ULP) when it:
  • Interferes with, restrains, or coerces an employee exercising rights under the FSLMRS.
  • Encourages or discourages membership in a union by discriminating in hiring, tenure, promotion, or other conditions of employment (COE).
  • Engages in union business or assists or treats an equivalent union more favorably when furnishing routine services.
  • Disciplines or discriminates against an employee who files a complaint, affidavit, or petition or provides information or testimony.
  • Refuses to negotiate or consult in good faith with a union.
  • Fails or refuses to cooperate in impasse procedures and decisions.
  • Enforces any rule or regulation that conflicts with applicable CBAs (except those implementing the prohibited personnel practices).
  • Fails or refuses to comply with the FSLMRS.
For more information about agency ULPs, see Practice Note, Unfair Labor Practices Under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS): Overview. For more information about FLRA processes, see:
The tables below list agency ULPs with a citation to FLRA or federal court precedent determining if an agency's action violated the FSLMRS. To avoid committing ULPs when dealing with the recognized unions within the agency, agency management can use this Chart to:
  • Identify agency actions resulting in unlawful interference with employees' rights under the FSLMRS.
  • Understand what agency actions may be considered discriminatory under the FSLMRS.
  • Determine when the agency could be unlawfully sponsoring or controlling a labor organization.
  • Understand what constitutes bad faith bargaining.
  • Understand when an agency's failure to cooperate with a Federal Service Impasses Panel (FSIP) order may violate the FSLMRS.
  • Understand what agency rules and regulations may conflict with a CBA.
  • Understand the circumstances that could be considered an unlawful bypass of the recognized union.
  • Determine when the agency must provide the union with requested information.
  • Recognize when the recognized union representative must be invited to participate in formal discussions.
  • Recognize the circumstances when the requested union representative must be allowed to participate in investigatory examinations (Weingarten).
  • Determine its obligation to grant union official time.
  • Supply citations to precedent when advising agency management on how to interact with recognized unions in the federal service to avoid violating the FSLMRS.

Agency ULPs

ULP Type
Citation
Agency Unlawful Interference (5 U.S.C. § 7116 (a)(1))
Interference Found
Prohibiting employees from distributing union literature in non-work areas during non-work time.
Prohibiting employees from publicizing union matters affecting employees' terms and COE.
Preventing an employee from showing a union film soliciting union membership during non-work time in a non-work area.
Prohibiting the union from engaging in fund-raising activities during non-work time in a non-work area.
Grieving the union's decision to send letters to members of Congress and the President about a unit employee's directed reassignment.
Maintaining a rule prohibiting the union representative from speaking with a newspaper reporter about possible staff reductions.
Banning employees from wearing union insignia at work unless wearing union insignia disrupts agency operations.
Expressing personal views about the union containing expressions made under coercive conditions (when the FLRA is not conducting an election).
Oklahoma City Air Logistics Ctr. (ALFC), Tinker AFB, Okla., 6 F.L.R.A. 159 (1981) (adopting administrative law judge's (ALJ) reasoning and decision).
Expressing personal views about the union (when the FLRA is conducting an election) except for publicizing and encouraging employees to vote in the election, correcting false statements, and providing information on labor relations policy.
Threatening to terminate a summer intern's employment because the intern pursued a grievance.
Threatening to change an employee's evaluation if she pursued her grievance.
Threatening a reduction-in-force (RIF) if the union continued to file grievances.
Referring to previously filed ULP charges as worthless and threatening repercussions for filing additional charges.
Orally reprimanding an employee for refusing a direct order to be silent when representing another employee in an investigatory interview.
Taking an action against a supervisor that has a chilling effect on employees exercising protected rights.
Denying an employee or the union the right to post union communications on agency bulletin boards or newspapers when the right is established by contract or past practice.
Prohibiting employees from soliciting union membership during non-work time in non-work areas.
Barring a non-employee union representative from entering agency premises for representational purposes when no special circumstances exist.
Agency issued letter to a union representing employees in disciplinary matters prohibiting the union from engaging in any communication with any bargaining unit employee outside the presence of agency counsel.
Denying the union access to distribute information on the agency's outside public premises after granting similar access to others.
No Interference Found
Enforcing strict uniform appearance in law enforcement agencies (prohibiting union insignia).
Discussing official time in a mid-year performance appraisal.
Denying the union and an employee the right to privileged communication because of management's need to know the informant's identity.
Prohibiting the distribution of union literature amounting to flagrant misconduct (disparaging a manager using racial epithets and stereotyping).
Agency Discrimination (5 U.S.C. § 7116(a)(2), (4)) 
Discriminatory Actions
Failing to promote employee engaged in protected activity.
Lowering the performance evaluation of an employee who was engaged in protected activity.
Making statements to an employee linking official time usage to a lack of timeliness in accomplishing work (lowering performance appraisal).
Disciplining an employee for engaging in protected activity.
Denying an employee's overseas extension request because the employee engaged in protected activity.
Denying an employee's flight assignment because of his protected activity.
Terminating probationary period employees for engaging in protected activity.
Reducing gain-sharing awards because employees engaged in union activities during work time.
Forcing a union observer to sign a statement disavowing knowledge of agency conduct subject to a ULP charge under investigation and stating that union activities played no part in agency actions taken against the employee. 
Suspending an employee based on his participation in a ULP charge.
Mixed Motive Non-Discriminatory Actions
Taking an action against employee engaged in protected activity when the agency had a legitimate reason for taking the action.
Not selecting an employee for legitimate reasons when also considering the employee's protected activity.
Agency Control of Labor Organization (5 U.S.C. Section 7116(a)(3))
Failing to provide a union with equivalent status and the same services and facilities provided to the incumbent union.
Prohibiting an outside union from handing out literature on agency premises when the union has no other method of communicating with employees and while permitting other unions to do so.
Denying a rival union to the incumbent union access to agency premises without a general no-solicitation rule against outside organizations.
Agency Duty to Bargain in Good Faith (5 U.S.C. § 7116(a)(5))
Agencies must bargain COE, including the scope of the grievance procedure (term negotiations for a CBA). 
Agencies must bargain when the union requests mid-term negotiations (subjects not covered by the CBA).
Agencies must bargain proposed changes in COE with limitations (see Scope of Bargaining).
Agencies must bargain negotiation ground rules with unions.
Agencies cannot unilaterally set negotiation dates and delay negotiations without justification.
Scope of Bargaining
Agencies need not bargain matters contrary to government-wide rules and regulations. 
Agencies are not required to bargain matters contrary to agency rules and regulations that have a compelling need.
Agencies are not required to bargain their internal security practices when there is a reasonable connection between the security practices and the security of its operations.
Agencies are not required to bargain the decision to exercise a management right, but the effects of the agencies' actions may be within the duty to bargain.
Agencies must bargain concerning procedures when exercising a management right that involves a change in bargaining unit employees' working conditions (impact and implementation bargaining).
Bargaining COE
Agencies must provide the union with notice and the opportunity to bargain concerning changes in COE when the change has an actual or reasonably foreseeable effect that is more than de minimis.
A memorandum that does not change the nature or type of employee duties, but adjusts or alters how employees perform their duties affects working conditions, but not conditions of employment and does not constitute a change requiring the agency to bargain. 
Changes in COE (More Than De Minimis)
Changing appointment schedules affecting employees' ability to complete other work.
Changing work hours resulting in lost overtime opportunities.
Implementing a program affecting future career and retirement plans that involves a benefit loss of $25,000.
Ordering an employee's relocation that negatively affects the employee's ability to perform duties.
Adding tasks requiring additional training and more complex duties.
Ending a practice of granting employees four hours of administrative leave to attend Employee Appreciation Day activities.
Stopping rotational assignments resulting in employees' children losing access to Department of Defense Schools.
Changing the number of remedial firearms training hours for employees from 80 hours to eight hours without implementing an equivalent training program.
Reassigning employee to a different unit resulting in the employee's inability to earn pay differential and overtime.
Reassigning and relocating employees resulting in less travel, less overtime, loss of a laptop computer, and other employees having less space and losing access to windows.
Requiring lead employees to perform shift supervisory duties that could affect the relative qualifications for promotion of all bargaining unit employees.
Relocating employee from one floor to another resulting in non-working computers, computer file access denials, and storage cabinet losses.
Adopting a side-handle baton requiring a new training program with mandatory certification and refresher training resulting in possible discipline if employees did not successfully complete the training.
Offering voluntary separation incentive pay (VSIP) to employees so the agency could offer the positions to interns.
Assigning supervisory duties to bargaining unit employees.
Decreasing bargaining unit employees' adjudication time.
Disallowing police officers to carry their weapons between home and work.
Changing the time frame for employees to improve performance and correct deficiencies from a reasonable opportunity to 30 to 90 days.
Changing an employee's tour of duty, affecting his ability to report to a second job.
Shutting down an organizational unit due to lack of work, potentially affecting the employees' COE. 
Changing the days of the week the employee is scheduled to work.
Moving employee parking arrangements to off-site facilities.
Changing flextime program requirements.
Stopping the practice of paying border patrol agents to have their vehicles cleaned twice a month and when undergoing maintenance.
Contracting out the employee assistance program (EAP) resulting in a changed process for employees seeking assistance.
Changing a break policy.
Implementing a reorganization that changed the way work was assigned.
Changing employee job status from on-call to non-pay status.
Reassigning employees to positions that could potentially affect their careers, promotional opportunities, and performance ratings.
Permanently prohibiting inspectors from parking in a lot the agency used for inspecting vehicles.
Reassigning inspectors on a voluntary basis for 120-day details negatively affecting other inspectors' COE.
Relocating revenue offices for 60 days at site locations 12 to 16 miles from their permanent assignment and placing them on fixed tours of duty.
Implementing a study potentially affecting employee performance.
Installing equipment potentially creating health hazards for employees.
Changing clinical privileges of two doctors significantly affecting the procedures they could perform.
Relocating employees to smaller work space with more noise.
Expanding the class of employees subject to driving record verification.
Implementing a moratorium on permanently promoting certain general schedule (GS) bargaining unit employees.
Relocating the nurses' breakroom to a location further away from the patient-care area.
Deciding to move reclassified employees into different award pools.
Denying computer access to agents assigned to administrative duties.
De Minimis Changes in COE 
Upholding the FLRA's longstanding application of the de minimis exception to the duty to bargain, as a matter of law.
Reducing reserved parking spaces when there was enough alternate parking.
Changing vessel boarding procedures with no effect on employees' COE.
Increasing workload with no new duties.
Changing the content and follow-up process for voluntary employment surveys.
Revising provisions of an agency manual requiring revenue office to perform in-office duties on a rotational basis and to follow certain procedures before contacting a taxpayer.
Directing agents arresting aliens at a backlogged station to take the aliens to a nearby station for processing.
Implementing a new procedure where ALJs would receive un-marked-up files.
Temporarily moving an employee to another building.
Stopping unit employees from giving recertification training to other unit employees.
Changing the work assignment process using an alphabetical assignment system.
Reassigning an employee to her previous position after three months.
Bargaining to Impasse
Agencies must bargain with unions to impasse.
Agencies must allow unions reasonable time to invoke the FSIP before implementing any proposal.
Bad Faith Bargaining 
Failing to give the union proper notice of a proposed change in bargaining unit employees' COE and implementing the change without bargaining.
Seriously breaching a written agreement.
Seriously breaching an oral agreement.
Agency Refusal to Cooperate in Impasse Procedures (5 U.S.C. § 7116(a)(6))
Agencies must not implement a change in COE when directed by the FSIP to maintain the status quo.
Agency must comply with FSIP procedures when implementing a change in COE.
Agency Regulations Conflicting with the CBA (5 U.S.C. § 7116(a)(7))
Agencies cannot rely on regulations issued after the parties' negotiated agreement.
Agencies may rely on regulations issued after the parties' negotiated agreement when the parties agree.
Failure or Refusal to Comply with FSLMRS Provisions (5 U.S.C. § 7116(a)(8))
Dealing Directly with Bargaining Unit Employees on COE
Negotiating directly with unit employees to put pressure on the union to take a certain course of action.
Communicating directly with unit employees about grievances, disciplinary matters, and other matters related to the collective bargaining relationship.
Delivering a disciplinary decision to a represented unit employee.
Refusing to Give the Union Requested Information
Refusing to provide the union with requested data that is normally maintained by the agency in the regular course of business.
Refusing to give the union requested information that is reasonably available and necessary for full and proper discussion, understanding, and negotiation of subjects within the scope of bargaining.
Refusing to give the union requested data, including guidance, advice, counsel, or training provided for management officials, when the union can show a particularized need for the information. 
Refusing to give the union requested information because of the time required to put the information together.
Refusing to give the union requested information because of the cost of getting the information.
Refusing to create documents from electronic records to provide the union with requested information.
Refusing to provide the union with requested Privacy Act information when the employee signs a release of information.
Refusing to provide the union with requested information not barred by the Privacy Act.
Refusing to provide the union with requested information that does not result in a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
Failing to respond to the union's information request in a timely manner.
Permitting a union to review but failing to furnish the requested information to the union.
Failing to inform the union that the information requested does not exist.
Failing to furnish the union requested information without charge.
Unreasonably delaying the requested information to the union without justification.
Waiting until the day of arbitration to provide union requested documents.
Refusing to Allow the Recognized Union Representative to Participate in Formal Discussions
Meeting (without conversation) to announce a new staffing policy without union representation.
Meeting between management and employees to announce a work schedule and have employees select their shifts without speaking and without union representation.
Meeting with the warden to try to resolve differences before filing a grievance, even though neither the employee or the supervisor could speak.
Interviewing a bargaining unit employee to prepare for a ULP hearing without union representation.
Interviewing bargaining unit employees to prepare for third-party proceedings without union representation.
Telephonically interviewing bargaining unit employees to prepare for an MSPB hearing without union representation.
Interviewing a bargaining unit employee called as a witness in an arbitration hearing without union representation.
Meeting with employee to discuss the employee's call to security without union representation.
Mediating EEO complaints without union representation.
Failing to provide the union with adequate notice so the union can choose its representative to attend the meeting.
Failing to allow the union representative to speak or make statements at the meeting.
Refusing to Allow the Requested Union Representative to Participate at Investigatory Examinations (Weingarten Meetings)
When an employee requests representation at an investigatory interview, the agency must grant the request, discontinue the interview, or offer the employee the choice between continuing without representation or not having the interview.
Agencies cannot coerce employees into waiving their right to union representation.
Agencies cannot deny the union representative the right to speak and participate on the record.
Agencies cannot deny the union representative the right to ask questions, help employees express views, seek clarification, and suggest other avenues of inquiry.
Agencies cannot normally deny the union representative the right to consult with the employee.
Denying Official Time
Denying official time for negotiating local supplements.
Denying official time for travel to participate in negotiations.