Inconsistent dispute resolution clauses: exploring the limits of the Fiona Trust presumption (Hong Kong Court of First Instance) | Practical Law

Inconsistent dispute resolution clauses: exploring the limits of the Fiona Trust presumption (Hong Kong Court of First Instance) | Practical Law

In H v G [2022] HKCFI 1327, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance set aside an arbitral tribunal's determination that it had jurisdiction over claims under a warranty where an associated contract contained the arbitration clause, but the warranty itself provided for litigation in Hong Kong.

Inconsistent dispute resolution clauses: exploring the limits of the Fiona Trust presumption (Hong Kong Court of First Instance)

Published on 25 May 2022Hong Kong - PRC
In H v G [2022] HKCFI 1327, the Hong Kong Court of First Instance set aside an arbitral tribunal's determination that it had jurisdiction over claims under a warranty where an associated contract contained the arbitration clause, but the warranty itself provided for litigation in Hong Kong.