DOL Announces Nonenforcement Policy and Appeal of District Court Ruling Vacating Final Association Health Plan Rules | Practical Law

DOL Announces Nonenforcement Policy and Appeal of District Court Ruling Vacating Final Association Health Plan Rules | Practical Law

The Department of Labor (DOL) has announced an appeal (by the Department of Justice (DOJ)) of the March 2019 federal district court decision vacating the DOL's association health plan (AHP) final regulations. In addition, DOL (in coordination with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)) announced that it will not pursue enforcement actions against employers and other entities that took steps in good faith reliance on the AHP final regulations, including to secure AHP coverage, before the district court's decision.

DOL Announces Nonenforcement Policy and Appeal of District Court Ruling Vacating Final Association Health Plan Rules

by Practical Law Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation
Published on 30 Apr 2019USA (National/Federal)
The Department of Labor (DOL) has announced an appeal (by the Department of Justice (DOJ)) of the March 2019 federal district court decision vacating the DOL's association health plan (AHP) final regulations. In addition, DOL (in coordination with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)) announced that it will not pursue enforcement actions against employers and other entities that took steps in good faith reliance on the AHP final regulations, including to secure AHP coverage, before the district court's decision.
On April 29, 2019, the DOL issued a policy statement and news release in response to a March 2019 federal district court decision vacating the DOL's association health plan (AHP) final regulations (see Practice Note, Association Health Plans and Legal Update, Federal Judge Vacates Association Health Plan Provisions as Unreasonable Under ERISA). The DOL news release announces an appeal of the district court ruling by the Department of Justice (DOJ). In addition, DOL indicated that it will not – for a limited transition period – pursue enforcement actions against employers and other parties that took steps in good faith reliance on the AHP final regulations before the district court's decision.

AHP Guidance and Related Litigation

The DOL developed its AHP final regulations in response to a 2017 Trump Administration executive order calling for greater access to AHPs, including by expanding the then-existing DOL commonality of interest standards interpreting the meaning of "employer" under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) (Executive Order 13813 (Oct. 17, 2017); see Legal Update, Trump Administration Calls for Expanded Use of Health Reimbursement Arrangements). The DOL issued AHP proposed regulations in January 2018 and finalized those rules in June 2018 (83 Fed. Reg. 28912 (June 21, 2018); see Legal Updates, DOL Proposed Association Health Plan Rules Would Expand Coverage Options for Small Employers and DOL Final Association Health Plan Rules Expand Coverage Options for Small Employers). The AHP final regulations permit employers in the small group health insurance market to form an association enabling them to buy insurance in the large group market, where they are subject to less regulation.

District Court Ruling Vacating AHP Final Regulations

Eleven states and the District of Columbia challenged the AHP final regulations in federal court under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), arguing that the regulations were an unreasonable regulatory interpretation of ERISA. On March 28, 2019, a federal district court vacated provisions of the AHP final regulations addressing:
  • Bona fide groups or associations of employers.
  • A standard for assessing whether association members shared a sufficient commonality of interest.
  • Dual treatment of working owners as employers and employees.
After the district court's decision, the DOL issued FAQ guidance (April 2, 2019) stating that it disagreed with the ruling and was considering, in consultation with the DOJ, how to respond. On April 26, 2019, the DOJ filed an appeal of the decision.

Limited-Duration DOL Nonenforcement Policy (in Coordination with HHS)

Under the DOL's April 29, 2019 policy, the DOL will not pursue enforcement actions against:
  • Employers and other parties for potential violations stemming from action taken in good faith reliance on the AHP final regulations' validity before the district court's decision, if the parties meet their responsibilities to association members and participants and beneficiaries to pay health benefit claims as promised.
  • Existing AHPs for continuing to provide benefits to members who enrolled in good faith reliance on the AHP final regulations' validity before the district court's decision, through the remainder of the applicable plan year or contract term in force at the time of the district court's decision.
The DOL's nonenforcement policy will apply for existing AHPs until their current plan year or contract term expires.
In announcing this policy, DOL was advised by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) that employers in an insured AHP have an independent right under the guaranteed renewability provision of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA) to continue insurance coverage through the end of the applicable plan year, unless an exception applies (PHSA § 2703 (42 U.S.C. § 300gg-2); see Practice Note, Grandfathered Health Plans Under the ACA: ACA Provisions That Apply to Grandfathered Plans).

Insurance Market Restrictions Under the PHSA

Under the PHSA's guaranteed renewability provision, if an AHP purchased a large group insurance policy, the insurer generally must keep the coverage in force for each participating employer and its covered employees through the end of the plan year. Once the plan year ends, however, the coverage must satisfy relevant market requirements for an employer's size—and disregarding the DOL's vacated AHP final regulations (for example, for small employers, the ACA's essential health benefits requirements; see Practice Note, Lifetime Limits, Annual Limits, and Essential Health Benefits Under the ACA).

HHS Policy Regarding Non-Federal Governmental Plans and Health Insurers

HHS will also follow a nonenforcement policy concerning the AHP final regulations. Specifically, HHS will not:
  • Pursue enforcement against non-federal governmental plans or health insurers for potential violations of Title XXVII of the PHSA caused by action taken in good faith reliance on the AHP final regulations before the district court's decision, through the remainder of the applicable plan year or contract term that was in force at the time of the district court's decision (see Practice Note, Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act (NMHPA): Non-Federal Governmental Plans).
  • Consider states to not be substantially enforcing the applicable requirements under Title XXVII of the PHSA in cases where the state adopts a similar approach concerning health insurance coverage issued within the state.

Practical Impact

Though limited in duration, the DOL and HHS nonenforcement policies announced in this guidance will provide some relief – particularly to small employers and sole proprietors that may have obtained health coverage in reliance on the AHP final regulations before the district court decision vacating those regulations. Without the DOL and HHS nonenforcement policies, these entities faced significant uncertainty in the short-term regarding their compliance obligations under the AHP coverage. But with the AHP final regulations now the subject of an appellate court appeal, there will continue to be uncertainty in this space for the immediate future. Small employers and other entities will need to closely monitor future developments regarding the AHP final regulations as they develop an approach for subsequent plan years or contract terms.