Associative victimisation claim should not have been struck out (EAT) | Practical Law

Associative victimisation claim should not have been struck out (EAT) | Practical Law

In Thompson v London Central Bus Company Ltd UKEAT/0108/15, the EAT considered a claim for associative victimisation and the nature of the connection between the claimant and the individual who had performed the protected act.

Associative victimisation claim should not have been struck out (EAT)

Practical Law UK Legal Update 1-618-8383 (Approx. 5 pages)

Associative victimisation claim should not have been struck out (EAT)

by Practical Law Employment
Published on 17 Sep 2015 • ExpandEngland, European Union, Scotland...Wales
In Thompson v London Central Bus Company Ltd UKEAT/0108/15, the EAT considered a claim for associative victimisation and the nature of the connection between the claimant and the individual who had performed the protected act.