Requirement for Muslim jilbab not to present a tripping hazard was not discriminatory (EAT) | Practical Law

Requirement for Muslim jilbab not to present a tripping hazard was not discriminatory (EAT) | Practical Law

In Begum v Pedagogy Auras UK Ltd (t/a Barley Lane Montessori Day Nursery) UKEAT/0309/13, the EAT considered whether an employment tribunal had been entitled to find that a requirement for a jilbab not to present a tripping hazard was not discriminatory.

Requirement for Muslim jilbab not to present a tripping hazard was not discriminatory (EAT)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 4-614-5066 (Approx. 5 pages)

Requirement for Muslim jilbab not to present a tripping hazard was not discriminatory (EAT)

by Practical Law Employment
Published on 27 May 2015 • England, Scotland, Wales
In Begum v Pedagogy Auras UK Ltd (t/a Barley Lane Montessori Day Nursery) UKEAT/0309/13, the EAT considered whether an employment tribunal had been entitled to find that a requirement for a jilbab not to present a tripping hazard was not discriminatory.