COVID-19: implications of judgment in business interruption test case | Practical Law

COVID-19: implications of judgment in business interruption test case | Practical Law

In this article, James Breese and Phil Taylor at Fenchurch Law, examine the findings of the High Court in FCA v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 2448 (Comm), the test case brought by the FCA seeking legal clarity on the meaning and effect of certain non-damage business interruption (BI) insurance policy wordings.

COVID-19: implications of judgment in business interruption test case

Practical Law UK Articles w-027-5416 (Approx. 14 pages)

COVID-19: implications of judgment in business interruption test case

by James Breese and Phil Taylor, Fenchurch Law
Published on 22 Sep 2020England, United Kingdom, Wales
In this article, James Breese and Phil Taylor at Fenchurch Law, examine the findings of the High Court in FCA v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd and others [2020] EWHC 2448 (Comm), the test case brought by the FCA seeking legal clarity on the meaning and effect of certain non-damage business interruption (BI) insurance policy wordings.
For an analysis of the decision of the Supreme Court in this case, see Article, COVID-19: implications of Supreme Court judgment in FCA BI test case.