PTAB Patentability Challenges: Proceeding Types and Differences | Practical Law

PTAB Patentability Challenges: Proceeding Types and Differences | Practical Law

This video, with Charles Macedo of Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, discusses the three types of post-grant patentability challenges made available by the America Invents Act. It discusses key differences between inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and covered business method review (CBM), including how to determine which type of challenge is available, and typical fees and timelines.

PTAB Patentability Challenges: Proceeding Types and Differences

Practical Law US Video and Audio w-025-7724 (Approx. 3 pages)

PTAB Patentability Challenges: Proceeding Types and Differences

by Charles Macedo, Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, with Practical Law Intellectual Property & Technology
Law stated as of 01 Jun 2020 • USA (National/Federal)
This video, with Charles Macedo of Amster, Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, discusses the three types of post-grant patentability challenges made available by the America Invents Act. It discusses key differences between inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and covered business method review (CBM), including how to determine which type of challenge is available, and typical fees and timelines.