CFPB Rulemaking Proposals to Prevent Algorithmic Bias in Home Automated Valuation Models | Practical Law

CFPB Rulemaking Proposals to Prevent Algorithmic Bias in Home Automated Valuation Models | Practical Law

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published an outline of proposals and alternatives under consideration for eventual rulemaking to ensure that automated valuation models (AVM) used to help determine home valuations are accurate, unbiased, and fair.

CFPB Rulemaking Proposals to Prevent Algorithmic Bias in Home Automated Valuation Models

by Practical Law Finance
Published on 07 Mar 2022USA (National/Federal)
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) published an outline of proposals and alternatives under consideration for eventual rulemaking to ensure that automated valuation models (AVM) used to help determine home valuations are accurate, unbiased, and fair.
On February 23, 2022, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) issued an outline of proposals and alternatives (outline) under consideration for eventual rulemaking to ensure that automated valuation models (AVMs) used to help determine home valuations are accurate, unbiased, and fair. The CFPB announced that the outline will now be reviewed by a Small Business Advisory Review Panel (SBRP) who will collect information to determine the potential impact of the proposals and alternatives under consideration on small businesses.
This CFPB action was expressly noted in its Fall 2021 regulatory agenda as an ongoing, interagency rulemaking (see Legal Update, CFPB Publishes its Fall 2021 Semiannual Regulatory Agenda) and joins other recent federal agency and congressional committee initiatives to combat broader issues of bias and discrimination in home valuations (see Legal Update, Consumer Finance Roundup for February 2022: CFPB Warns of Appraisal Discrimination).

Required Rulemaking for AVMs

The Dodd-Frank Act (Dodd-Frank) defines AVMs as “any computerized model used by mortgage originators and secondary market issuers to determine the collateral worth of a mortgage secured by a consumer’s principal dwelling." Dodd-Frank, which added section 1125 to the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), requires that the CFPB, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) (collectively, the federal agencies) develop regulations to implement quality control standards for AVMs that are designed to:
  • Ensure a high level of confidence in the estimates produced.
  • Protect against the manipulation of data.
  • Seek to avoid conflicts of interest.
  • Require random sample testing and reviews.
  • Account for any other such factor that the federal agencies determine to be appropriate.
The final AVM regulations will be enforced by the FDIC, the Board, the NCUA, and the OCC with respect to insured banks, savings associations and credit unions, as well as federally regulated subsidiaries they own and control. The CFPB, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and State attorneys general will have enforcement authority with respect to other non-depository participants in the market.

AVM Potential for Bias

In announcing the outline, the CFPB noted that appraisals generated by algorithmic computer models such as AVMs, as well as traditional in-person appraisals, are susceptible to bias and inaccuracy, absent appropriate safeguards. The CFPB noted that obtaining an accurate estimate of a home's worth is one of the most important steps in the mortgage process for homebuyers. Inaccurate valuations, both too high and too low, can pose risks to consumers including:
  • Overvaluing homes can put family wealth at-risk, create reselling challenges, and lead to higher rates of foreclosure.
  • Low valuations can jeopardize home sales and prevent homeowners from refinancing, which makes it harder to build wealth or make repairs.
  • Systematically low valuations driven by biased appraisers may exacerbate existing disparities in the housing market.
Citing recent findings published by the FHFA (Reducing Valuation Bias by Addressing Appraiser and Property Commentary), Fannie Mae (Appraising the Appraisal), and Freddie Mac (Racial and Ethnic Valuation Gaps in Home Purchase Appraisals), the CFPB stated that it is particularly concerned that without proper safeguards, flawed versions of these models could digitally redline certain neighborhoods and further embed and perpetuate historical lending, wealth, and home value disparities.

Small Business Advisory Review Panel Process

Before issuing a proposed rule on AVM quality control standards, Dodd-Frank requires the CFPB to organize a Small Business Advisory Review Panel (SBRP), to seek input from small entity representatives (SERs) that are likely to be subject to the AVM rulemaking under consideration.
At an SBRP outreach meeting, SERs will provide the panel with advice and recommendations on the potential impacts of the regulatory proposals and alternatives on small entities. Within 60 days of convening the SBRP, the panel is required to complete a report on the input received from the SERs.
SER feedback is due April 8, 2022 in order for the feedback to be considered and incorporated into the SBRP report. Other stakeholder input is due by May 13, 2022.

AVM Proposals and Alternatives Under Consideration

To comply with the required SBRP process, the outline seeks input from SERs on questions regarding various proposals and alternatives under consideration for the AVM rulemaking, including:
  • Appropriate scope of eventual regulation as either:
    • flexible, principles-based; or
    • prescriptive, rules-based.
  • Defining AVMs used to determine the collateral worth, including:
    • AVMs used for making underwriting decisions;
    • reviews of already completed determinations;
    • developing an appraisal by a certified or licensed appraiser;
    • post-origination events such as loan modifications and other changes to existing loans, credit line reductions or suspensions, and securitization; and
    • certain AVM use related to appraisal waiver loans.
  • Defining mortgage originators including a general definition and a special definition of that term to cover servicers under limited circumstances.
  • Defining secondary market issuers.
  • Defining mortgage.
  • Defining consumer’s principal dwelling, including:
    • coverage of consumers;
    • coverage of dwelling;
    • limiting coverage to principal dwelling; and
    • treatment of new construction.
  • Appropriate scope of eventual AVM regulation requirements, including:
    • quality control standards generally; and
    • specifying a nondiscrimination quality control factor.
  • A 12 month implementation period.
The CFPB has also identified certain types of small entities that may be subject to the AVM rule options under consideration and regulated by the CFPB. Specifically, the CFPB has identified five categories of non-depository institutions whose use of AVMs may be covered under the revenue criteria established by the Small Business Administration:
  • Real estate credit companies with average annual receipts of $41.5 million or less.
  • Secondary market financing companies with average annual receipts of $41.5 million or less.
  • Other non-depository credit intermediation companies that originate mortgages with average annual receipts of $41.5 million or less.
  • Mortgage and nonmortgage loan brokers with average annual receipts of $8 million or less.
  • Other activities related to credit intermediation such as mortgage loan servicers with average annual receipts of $22 million or less.