CFTC Global Markets Advisory Committee Makes Recommendations on Digital Assets, T+1, and Treasury ETFs as Eligible Collateral | Practical Law

CFTC Global Markets Advisory Committee Makes Recommendations on Digital Assets, T+1, and Treasury ETFs as Eligible Collateral | Practical Law

The CFTC's Global Markets Advisory Committee (GMAC) formally advanced three recommendations to the CFTC regarding regulatory clarity for digital assets, the transition to T+1 securities settlement, and clarification that US Treasury exchange traded funds (ETFs) may be used as eligible collateral for uncleared derivatives trades subject to CFTC uncleared margin rules.

CFTC Global Markets Advisory Committee Makes Recommendations on Digital Assets, T+1, and Treasury ETFs as Eligible Collateral

by Practical Law Finance
Published on 13 Mar 2024USA (National/Federal)
The CFTC's Global Markets Advisory Committee (GMAC) formally advanced three recommendations to the CFTC regarding regulatory clarity for digital assets, the transition to T+1 securities settlement, and clarification that US Treasury exchange traded funds (ETFs) may be used as eligible collateral for uncleared derivatives trades subject to CFTC uncleared margin rules.
On March 7, 2024, the CFTC's Global Markets Advisory Committee (GMAC) formally advanced recommendations to the CFTC regarding:

CFTC Taxonomy for Digital Assets

The GMAC Digital Asset Markets Subcommittee issued recommendations on digital assets that set out a taxonomy of consistent language for participants in the digital asset ecosystem designed to be used to help draft future legislation, regulations, policies, procedures, and other situations where a common approach to understanding digital assets is needed across regions and jurisdictions. The recommendations build upon the classification efforts of global prudential standard setters and regional authorities, including the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the Financial Stability Board (FSB).
To aid in the classification of digital assets, the recommendations provide the following categories:
  • Money or money-like digital assets, which must have a reliable store of value, medium of exchange, and unit of account. Examples include central bank digital currencies (CBDC), bank deposits, "reserve-backed" digital currencies (all of which are classified as money digital assets under the taxonomy), and stablecoins (which are money-like digital assets) (see Practice Note, Stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs): Overview).
  • Financial digital assets, typical use cases of which include financial investment, financial return, and access to capital markets. Examples include digital asset securities and derivatives.
  • Alternative digital assets, typical use cases of which include representation of an interest in a good or non-financial asset. Examples include tokenized alternative digital assets, such as tokenized physical commodities (see Practice Note, Asset Tokenization 101).
  • Cryptoassets, including cryptocurrencies, typical use cases of which include a network-specific medium of exchange, unit of account for transaction fees, speculative investment, and branded store of value. Examples include non-redeemable tokens with no rights conferred against the issuer that are used as a speculative investment.
  • Functional digital assets, typical use cases of which include governance or access to a specific infrastructure or app, and specific functional utility. Examples include native tokens that cannot be exchange for value issued to provide the owner of the token with a specific utility, such as:
    • application-specific governance rights, voting weights, or decision-making authority; and
    • record of entitlement right to rewards or revenue from a specific application or community.
  • Settlement controllable electronic records, typical use cases of which include digital recordkeeping, particularly in facilitation of financial instruments. Examples include settlement tokens.
  • Other digital assets, in which the Digital Asset Markets Subcommittee recognizes the potential for future innovation and retains this category for new developments that may arise in the digital asset ecosystem.
The recommendations provide a set of features to aid in classification of digital assets, including:
  • Issuer.
  • Mechanism underpinning asset value.
  • Rights conferral.
  • Fungibility.
  • Redeemability.
  • Nature of record.
  • Types of users or holder types.
  • Intended end user.
  • Entity that serves as the custodian.
The recommendations also include an appendix illustrating the workflow of a repo transaction in which distributed ledger technology enables the exchange of collateral and cash (see Practice Note, Repos: Overview (US)).

CFTC Resources on T+1 Securities Settlement

The GMAC Technical Issues Subcommittee issued recommendations intended to support market participants as they prepare for the transition to T+1 settlement for US securities, as well as parallel moves to T+1 in Canada and Mexico (see Legal Update, SEC Shortens Standard Settlement Cycle to T+1).
On February 15, 2023, the SEC voted to adopt Rule 15c6-1, shortening the securities settlement cycle from trade date plus two business days (T+2) to trade date plus one business day (T+1). The US will transition to T+1 on May 28, 2024. The timelines for trade affirmation, allocation, and confirmation will all be shortened in the post-T+1 environment.
Products subject to the T+1 settlement cycle in the US are securities that do not carry an exemption from SEC Rule 15c6-1(a), which extends to the purchase and sale of securities issued by investment companies including mutual funds, private-label mortgage-backed securities, and limited partnership interests that are listed on an exchange. The products not subject to the T+1 settlement cycle include:
  • Security-based swaps (SBS), as the SEC did not include derivatives in the official scope of Rule 15c6-1(a).
  • Certain insurance products.
  • Certain foreign securities.
  • Contracts for the purchase or sale of limited partnership interests that are not listed on an exchange or for which quotations are not disseminated through automated quotation system of a registered securities association.
  • Transactions that underwriters and parties agree in advance to a settlement cycle other than the standard settlement cycle.
  • Contracts for the sale of cash of securities that are priced after 4:30 pm ET on the date they are priced.
  • Securities exempted by the SEC by order.
US Treasury bills, bonds, and listed options already settle at T+1 and will not be affected.
The recommendations provide that, for market participants using securities as collateral, it will be imperative to manage inventories as efficiently as possible to mitigate operational challenges and ensure collateral optimization by using automated processing and data standards. According to the recommendation, the SEC rule does not specifically mandate all OTC derivatives settle on a T+1 basis. Further, ISDA® plans to issue members a "Preferences Grid," where firms can indicate whether they intend to amend outstanding transactions previously confirmed on a longer settlement cycle to the reduced settlement cycle.
According to the recommendations, in order to reduce potential increase in settlement fail rates and potential buy-ins resulting from sales of loaned securities, lenders of securities should adopt a best practice of issuing recalls by 11:59 pm ET on the trade date (T). Generally, the more notice borrowers have to return securities, the more likely they will be returned in time for settlement.
According to the recommendations, moving to a T+1 settlement cycle may mean cost savings, reduced market risk, and lower margin requirements for market participants and, most directly, to members of clearing utilities such as the Depository Trust & Clearing Organization (DTCC), which has released a detailed discussion of the new trade-affirmation goals and operating models. The DTCC discussion includes a recommendation that 90% of all trades should be affirmed by 9:00 pm on the trade date. In addition, shorter timeframes associated with moving to a T+1 settlement:
  • Mean compression of timescales and rethinking of some legacy processes which are challenged by the new timeframes.
  • Impact firms across the financial services industry and throughout the trade lifecycle, including collateral management.
The recommendation provides an extensive list of resources available to help firms prepare for the T+1 transition, including resources on:
  • Implications for the foreign exchange markets of the T+1 move.
  • How foreign-listed securities trading in the US will be impacted.
  • SIFMA, Investment Company Institute, and DTCC resources available to help firms prepare for the transition.
  • Current settlement cycles in other securities products and markets.
According to the recommendations, the United Kingdom and European Union are also exploring acceleration of settlement from their current T+2 cycle.

US Treasury ETFs as Eligible Collateral

The GMAC Global Market Structure Subcommittee issued recommendations urging the CFTC to providing clarity that certain US Treasury ETFs qualify as eligible initial margin (IM) collateral under CFTC margin rules for uncleared swaps (CFTC margin rules) (see Practice Note, US Derivatives Regulation: Margin Collection and Exchange Requirements for Uncleared Swaps: Eligible Collateral Under the CFTC Margin Rules). The recommendations states that, in particular, the CFTC should specify that shares of an ETF that is an open-ended investment company registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, should be considered "redeemable securities" in a pooled investment fund.
This means that shares of an ETF that invests in qualifying assets and meets other relevant investment conditions, as detailed in the CFTC margin rules, would be considered eligible collateral under the CFTC margin rules.
The Global Market Structure Subcommittee is also requesting that the CFTC encourage the US prudential regulators to acknowledge and align with this clarification to the prudential margin rules for uncleared swaps, which would prevent inconsistent collateral standards among swap dealers.