Practical Law China: what to expect in 2021 | Practical Law

Practical Law China: what to expect in 2021 | Practical Law

Practitioners from a sampling of top-tier international and domestic firms give their views on the major legal developments they foresee in China in 2021 and how these developments will impact their practice going forward.

Practical Law China: what to expect in 2021

Practical Law UK Articles w-029-0548 (Approx. 12 pages)

Practical Law China: what to expect in 2021

by Brad Herrold and Practical Law China
Published on 12 Jan 2021China
Practitioners from a sampling of top-tier international and domestic firms give their views on the major legal developments they foresee in China in 2021 and how these developments will impact their practice going forward.
We asked a select panel of China law practitioners across a broad range of practice areas for their views on the major legal developments they foresee in China in 2021 – and for their predictions on how these changes will impact their own practice over the next few years.

How will China's new Civil Code impact businesses?

The long-awaited Civil Code of the People's Republic of China (PRC) took effect 1 January 2021. The Civil Code is a comprehensive amalgamation of laws, with sections governing property, contracts, personality, marriage and family, inheritance and torts. The new code simultaneously repealed and replaced the seminal laws in each of these areas. The enactment of the new code, which provides legal rules affecting almost all aspects of private life in China, was a historic legislative achievement.
"The Civil Code represents the first codification of laws in the legislative history of the PRC. While the Civil Code does not itself present many ground-breaking changes to existing law, taking a comprehensive view, it provides long-awaited clarity and consistency for legal practitioners. Echoing the adoption of the Foreign Investment Law, which mandates the uniform treatment of foreign and domestic investment activities in China, the new Civil Code represents uniformity at a more significant dimension, a further giant, welcomed step for legislative reform in China."
Jun Li, Han Kun Law Offices, Shanghai
While drafting and passing the new code was an enormous legislative project, the ongoing harmonisation of existing legislation with the provisions of the new code was another. On 30 December 2020, China's Supreme People's Court (SPC) released the first batch of seven new judicial interpretations supporting the Civil Code, amended 111 pre-existing judicial interpretations and normative documents and revoked another 116 items, effective concurrently with the new code.
Some contributors believe the impact of the Civil Code, together with other, more specific legislation that is likely to flow from it, will be felt most keenly in relation to the digital activities of businesses.
"Other legal developments in 2021 will almost certainly pale in comparison to the coming into effect of China's new Civil Code, which provides a uniform civil code for the first time and replaces the patchwork of civil law enactments that came before. In the coming year, international businesses will feel impacts across a range of areas, including contracts, secured transactions and civil litigation. Online businesses may feel the effects disproportionately, given the Civil Code's more robust provisions governing online contracts, as well as data privacy provisions that presage China's likely adoption of a new Personal Information Protection Law in the near future."
Paul McKenzie, Morrison & Foerster, Beijing and Shanghai
Other contributors see the new code as a major legislative milestone and expect it to significantly impact business activities in 2021, especially in relation to contracts, security, property and tort liability.
"The Civil Code will have a major impact on nearly all business activities within China and on companies located in or operating in relation to China. In 2021, the SPC intends to continue refining its civil judicial interpretation framework system to provide further guidance and clarity aligned with the Civil Code. Further, 2021 will begin to show how the Civil Code will be implemented and enforced in practice, which will determine its real impact. On balance, we expect the Civil Code to drive a significant need for advice in 2021, especially on its parts regarding contracts, security, property and tort liability."
Michael Munzinger, CMS, Shanghai

Will the new foreign investment regime present new opportunities?

In recent years China has been moving from its traditional approach to regulating market access for foreign investment toward a new negative list and information disclosure approach. On 1 January 2020, the Foreign Investment Law and related implementing rules took effect, formally unveiling another chapter in China's new foreign investment regulatory era.
In December 2020, China announced its next versions of the Market Access Negative List and the Catalogue of Foreign Investment in Encouraged Industries, with the former replacing its 2019 predecessor from 16 December 2020 and the latter replacing its 2019 counterpart from 27 January 2021. The next version of negative list dedicated for foreign investment is expected to be released in the following months.
Contributors foresee continued refinement of the new system in 2021, as well as the opening of new opportunities for foreign investment in financial and other sectors.
"For 2021, we anticipate a more profound and deepened transition to the 'negative list' management model, which may greatly enhance the transparency and predictability of foreign investment in China. Furthermore, we are looking forward to more favorable policies at the central and local levels to attract foreign investors and cultivate a more investor-friendly and international business environment. In particular, we are excited to see more prominent international competitors in banking, insurance, securities, asset management and other fields enter the arena and expand their onshore footprints."
Tiecheng Yang, Han Kun Law Offices, Beijing
Contributors also predict increased clarity into the government's view of the use of variable interest entity (VIE) arrangements and the redirection of the national security review regime to address China's growing commercial and technology security needs.
"Although the Foreign Investment Law set out a clearer framework for foreign investment into Mainland China, we expect further detailed rules and regulations to flesh out the high-level provisions of the new law in 2021, for example, in relation to the treatment of VIE structures. New waves of reform are also anticipated in the general foreign investment regime, defining a path to full implementation of the new law by 2025. In addition, we will see the further development of China's national security review regime for foreign investment. Effective from 18 January 2021, a new review regime will replace the current rules, under which a body headed by the NDRC and MOFCOM, will be established to be responsible for the day-to-day operations of security review covering foreign investment in military sectors as well as the acquisition by foreign entities of controlling stakes in sectors such as energy, natural resources, agriculture, internet technology and financial services."
John Xu, Linklaters, Shanghai

What new compliance challenges will the data privacy and cybersecurity regimes bring?

2020 was a busy year in the data privacy and cybersecurity space, with the issuance of network security review measures, an amended national personal information security standard and public consultation drafts of the Data Security Law and Personal Information Protection Law.
Contributors expect the two draft laws to be enacted in 2021, together with various national level rules and policies that flesh out the emerging data protection and security framework.
"China's draft Data Security Law and Personal Information Protection Law are expected to be finalized in 2021. Together with the Cybersecurity Law, the three laws, potentially overlapping but with different focuses, will comprise China's regulatory framework governing data from the perspective of cybersecurity, personal information protection and the security of 'important data'. We also expect that more implementing regulations related to topics such as the multi-level protection scheme, cross-border data transfer and protection of critical information infrastructure will be rolled out and implemented."
Yan Luo, Covington & Burling, Beijing
Contributors also forecast stricter and more sophisticated administrative enforcement of data protection and security as China develops the new regime.
"We expect the new rules on data security and protection will become more strictly enforced as China's public security bureaus gain manpower and experience. In addition, all government divisions are now including reviews of cybersecurity and data protection within the scope of their supervision work. For example, the China Securities Regulatory Commission examines IT structures and data governance before issuing licenses for securities and fund businesses and the National Healthcare Commission examines hospital information systems to protect patient information. For multinationals, cross-border data transfer is always a concern, and we predict that companies will need to establish and implement a security review process in relation to both data exports and the outsourcing of data processing responsibilities to external vendors."
Xun Yang, Llinks Law Offices, Shanghai
As a result, contributors believe that most companies operating in China will need to focus attention on cybersecurity and data protection compliance challenges in 2021.
"The year 2021 is likely to see the enactment of two milestone laws for data protection in China, the Personal Information Protection Law and the Data Security Law, which are aimed at protecting personal information and important data, respectively. Both laws mandate a range of compliance measures. In addition, China is expected to publish a series of implementing rules and standards to supplement the emerging regulatory framework, which will present additional compliance challenges for many companies in the coming year."
James Gong, Herbert Smith Freehills, Beijing

Will companies benefit from the new IPR and trade secrets protections?

In 2020, the National People's Congress (NPC), enacted the Civil Code, which significantly enhances the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR), and updated China's patent and copyright laws, and the SPC issued rules on handling evidence in IPR cases and disputes over IPR on e-commerce platforms, as well as a judicial interpretation on the protection of trade secrets.
As these developments are implemented in 2021, contributors believe China will promote the protection of IPR, including foreign-owned IPR, as a key pillar of its national development strategy.
"Following the amendments to the Trademark Law and Anti-unfair Competition Law in 2019, China continued in 2020 to promote the protection of IPR from the perspectives of national strategy formulation, international competition, innovation promotion and creation of a sound business climate. Looking ahead to 2021, the effective implementation of these legislative achievements remains an arduous task, especially under the evolving global political and economic environment. Despite the uncertainties and challenges, the major direction will be positive and forward."
Aggie Liu, FenXun Partners, Beijing
Specifically, contributors expect it to become more predictable and efficient for foreign and domestic rights holders to protect IPR in China going forward.
"2020 has been a year of pervasive changes to the Chinese legal and economic landscape. At the same time, the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has also had an impact on the global and Chinese economy, speeding up the shift to technology solutions and the e-economy, thereby increasing the value of intellectual property assets and the challenges in protecting these assets. These trends will endure in 2021 and we should see a positive impact from the updated Chinese IP legislation in more IP transactions and more efficient IP litigation."
Stephaan Meuwissen and Grace Guo, Hogan Lovells, Beijing

Will China use its new retaliatory tools to target specific companies?

In 2020, likely in response to strained relations with its major trade partners, China's legislature greatly accelerated the drafting and passage of the Export Control Law, which aggregated and expanded the scope of China's fragmented export control regime. The new law, together with the issuance of provisions on establishing an Unreliable Entity List and rules to block foreign secondary sanctions, provides the government with significant retaliatory tools that could be used to fight China's trade and influence wars.
In 2021, we will begin to see how the government will implement the new export control regime in practice and whether China will use its new tools to retaliate against companies that co-operate with perceived acts of aggression by foreign governments.
"The year 2021 may see the promulgation of a number of implementing regulations and rules for the new Export Control Law, the publication of new export control lists and the imposition of enforcement actions. In response to the increasing export control-related risks, Chinese domestic companies and MNCs with a presence in China are advised to actively improve their export control compliance programs. MNCs also need to find ways to manage potential conflicts between PRC law and the laws of other jurisdictions (such as the US) to avoid designation on the Unreliable Entity List."
Ren, Qing, Global Law Office, Beijing

Will the need for technology innovation trump the trade wars?

The government's attention in the technology sector in 2020 was aimed at protecting critical information infrastructure and personal information through cybersecurity and data privacy legislation and, more recently, reigning in the power of China's technology giants by enforcing its anti-trust rules.
Contributors forecast a continued push in these areas in 2021 by enacting the Data Security Law and Personal Information Protection Law, issuing related implementing rules, and stepping up enforcement activities. Some suggest legislative carve-outs may be created to facilitate the development of certain key emerging technologies.
"In 2021, the Chinese government is expected to issue detailed implementing rules and policies for the Export Control Law, further enforce the cybersecurity related rules, target China's internet giants for potential claims of online business monopoly and guide them on contributions to technology innovation. The protection of personal information and online privacy will remain a focus of the regulatory authorities, and we expect rules on the protection of important data and data cross-border transfers will be released. In regulating industrial and public data, it is possible that more space will be offered to allow exploitation of such data to facilitate the development of ITOS, 5G, AI, Robotics and so on."
Vincent Wang, Global Law Office, Shanghai
Contributors also foresee a shift as China's desire for technology innovation outweighs its concerns on trade and predict other, more meaningful long-term developments, including a revival of joint ventures.
"Political tensions will remain but will likely subside as economic realities replace security concerns. Long term, the laws and regulations which will likely have the greatest effect will be positive for technology companies, including regulations that remove red tape impeding the progress of autonomous cars, possible greater foreign exchange control flexibility to facilitate the acquisition of foreign technology, and SAMR's draft trade secret protection regulations, which aim to better protect hi-tech companies' intellectual property. We also expect to see a renaissance of the joint venture as Chinese companies target technology and Western companies target the China market and capital."
Mark Schaub, King & Wood Mallesons, London

How will increased anti-trust enforcement impact businesses?

In 2020, China's anti-trust regulator, the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR), circulated a draft amendment to the Anti-monopoly Law (AML), issued rules and guidelines to further flesh out China's rapidly maturing anti-trust regime and expanded its enforcement activities, including fines for failure to notify VIE-related concentrations.
The NPC is slated to finalise the AML amendment in 2021, and contributors believe the trend toward increased enforcement will continue and result in an increase in domestic merger control filings, filings by Chinese companies abroad and inter-governmental co-operation and private litigation.
"For 2021, I expect increased SAMR enforcement activities (especially in priority sectors such as the Internet and pharma), private antitrust litigation, more domestic merger filings, more filings by Chinese companies with foreign anti-trust authorities, and more co-operation between the SAMR's Anti-Monopoly Bureau and the antitrust authorities of BRICS and Belt-and-Road countries."
Adrian Emch, Hogan Lovells, Beijing
Initially, the SAMR's increased enforcement activities are likely to focus on certain industries, including technology, digital platforms and pharmaceuticals, but eventually they will be directed at all relevant businesses, and many companies will want to take effective, anticipatory compliance measures.
"Calls for stronger enforcement are getting louder in China. This theme is playing out in particular in sectors directly impacting Chinese consumers, including technology, digital, e-commerce platforms and pharmaceuticals, but all sectors will be ultimately affected. Sophisticated compliance will be required to achieve and maintain a successful business in China in the coming year."
Yong Bai, Clifford Chance, Beijing
In 2020, the SAMR issued its first unconditional clearance of a merger control filing involving a concentration in which a party adopted a VIE structure, and companies involved in similar concentrations that meet the turnover thresholds should consider filing in 2021 and beyond.
"On the transactional front, VIE structures are no longer an obstacle to merger control reviews. Deals that previously flew under the regulatory radar will now have to be vetted by SAMR. SAMR sent a very clear message by imposing the maximum fine for failure to file on Alibaba and a Tencent subsidiary in December. On the behavioural front, the recently released draft guidelines on digital platforms will likely give rise to heated debates. The Chinese context may be different, but it will be interesting to observe how much convergence there will be between SAMR and other antitrust agencies around the world grappling with the same issues."
Charles Pommiès, Allen & Overy, Brussels

What new prospects and restrictions will emerge in life sciences?

In 2020, China began to implement its national strategy to become an innovative drug manufacturer, passed the Biosecurity Law (which will take effect on 15 April 2021), promulgated implementing rules for the Drug Administration Law and issued rules expanding access to investigational medical devices.
Contributors believe the push toward innovation could lead to increased preferential policies for foreign investment and collaboration in 2021, as well as the issuance of rules governing expanded access to investigational drugs and the use of emerging technologies in medicine.
"Looking ahead to 2021, China may accelerate its march to become a pharmaceutical innovator by increasing preferential policies for foreign investors and international collaboration, though the competing policy to cultivate domestic champions could result in a tricky balance. We also may see rules that further clarify the MAH system, finalised measures on expanded access to investigational drugs and the drafting or promulgation of rules governing the use of emerging technologies such as AI, 5G, robotics and so on, in the medical field. Central to progress in these areas is the protection of data, and we will likely see a raft of legislation on cybersecurity and localization coming off the shelves."
Philip Cheng, Hogan Lovells, Shanghai

Will disputes surge in 2021 and what will be the preferred forum for resolving them?

2020 witnessed several important developments in relation to dispute resolution, including the use of technology to reduce the spread of COVID-19, the issuance by the SPC of a series of significant judicial interpretations, the further strengthening of reciprocal arrangements between Hong Kong and the Mainland on arbitration, and the potential opening of China-seated arbitrations administered by foreign arbitral institutions.
Contributors expect disputes to surge in 2021, due in part to disruptions stemming from the pandemic and the US-China trade war and anticipate the increasing use of technology in various dispute resolution forums.
"With the background of a new US administration and an increase in cross-border economic activities as coronavirus vaccines become widely available, we are likely to witness an up-tick in cross-border disputes in 2021, especially in the areas of intellectual property, international trade and contracts, bankruptcy and anti-trust. Furthermore, technology innovation such as online court hearings and depositions might become more common, and cases that were delayed in 2020 could also speed up in the new year, which could further contribute to increased dispute resolution activities."
Jianwei (Jerry) Fang, Zhong Lun Law Firm, Shanghai
Arbitration in Hong Kong and abroad is likely to continue as the method of choice for resolving disputes, while practitioners await further guidance on the ability of foreign arbitral institutions to administer arbitrations in Mainland China.
"Recent enhancements to the framework for arbitration between Mainland China and Hong Kong will continue to drive workflows in 2021 as arbitration remains a preferred means for resolving disputes between Chinese and international parties. We also look to gain further clarity on the ability of foreign arbitral institutions to administer arbitrations seated in Mainland China, on the heels of recent liberalization initiatives for designated areas in Shanghai and Beijing and recent non-precedential court decisions supportive of the concept. As we await that clarity, Mainland China arbitration institutions are likely to remain the preferred institutions to administer arbitrations seated in Mainland China."
Timothy W. Blakely, Morrison & Foerster, Hong Kong