Ask the team: CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: Should two companies register in respect of the same energy supply? | Practical Law

Ask the team: CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: Should two companies register in respect of the same energy supply? | Practical Law

An Ask the team article on whether two companies should register in respect of the same energy supply under the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC).

Ask the team: CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: Should two companies register in respect of the same energy supply?

by PLC Environment
Published on 03 Aug 2010UK
An Ask the team article on whether two companies should register in respect of the same energy supply under the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC).

Speedread

An Ask the team article on whether two companies should register in respect of the same energy supply when one of the companies is the one with the energy agreement and the other is the sole occupier of the site in question.

Question

Terms that appear in capital letters in this Ask the team are defined in Practice note, CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: PLC glossary and abbreviations.
Company A has an electricity supply agreement for a site which Company B has exclusive use of. Company A has registered as a Participant under the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC) in respect of that supply. Company B has been advised that it should register in respect of the same energy supply.
Question 1: Which of these companies should register for the CRC?
Question 2: And is Company A at risk of enforcement if Company B also registers in respect of the same energy supply?

Answer to Question 1: Which company needs to register?

The short answer to the first question is that the company that needs register under the CRC will depend on:
  • Which of the two companies is "responsible" for the electricity supply.
  • Whether a landlord and tenant relationship exists between the two companies.
  • Whether either company is part of a larger corporate Group.

When is a company "responsible" for an electricity supply under the CRC?

Section 1 of Schedule 1 to the CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme Order 2010 (SI 2010/768) (the CRC Order) sets out the criteria for determining whether an organisation (X) is "responsible" for a supply of electricity. Three questions have to be asked:
  • Does X have an agreement with another organisation (Y) for the supply of electricity?
  • Does X receive a supply of electricity further to that agreement?
  • Is the supply measured by a metering device where the electricity supplied is charged for as measured by the device (or is the supply a Dynamic Supply)?
If the electricity supply agreement is in Company A's name, and Company A pays for that supply on the basis of the meter that measures the supply and it consumes that electricity, then Company A will be the party responsible for that supply under the CRC.
However, if Company A is a facilities management company (or some other type of company that procures energy on behalf of other organisations and does not consume the energy itself) then A will not have to account for that supply under the CRC. This is known as the "Unconsumed Supply rule". Under the CRC, the company that consumes the energy would be responsible for that supply (assuming it can answer yes to the three questions that determine whether a supply exists for the purposes of the CRC).
In the example set out in the question in this Ask the team, it would initially appear that Company A is not responsible for the electricity supply as it is not consuming that supply and, hence, the supply in relation to Company A is an Unconsumed Supply. However, we also need to consider if Company A is Company B's landlord or licensor, or if Company A is part of a larger corporate Group. Both of these points are dealt with below.
If it turns out that Company A is the one who is responsible for the energy supply under the CRC, then Company B does not have to register as well just because it is the sole occupier of the site. Only one organisation needs to register in respect of any one energy supply: it is the organisation that is responsible for that supply.
For more information on how to work out who is responsible for an energy supply, see:

Is there a landlord and tenant relationship?

If Company A is Company B's landlord or licensor, then Company A will be responsible for the energy supply even if it is Company B that actually consumes the energy. This is known as the "landlord and tenant rule".
For more information on the landlord and tenant rule, see Practice note, CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: overview: Landlords and tenants.

What if either company is part of a Group?

Even if Company A or Company B (as relevant) were responsible for the energy supply in question, they may not necessarily be the ones who have to register as a Participant if they form part of a larger corporate Group.
The CRC applies to the Highest Parent Undertaking in a corporate structure. There are also rules about large subsidiaries being able to register separately from the rest of their Group if they qualify as a Significant Group Undertaking.
For an explanation of how this works, see:

So, who is responsible for the electricity supply: Company A or Company B?

We have not been told whether Company A (as opposed to a third party) is Company B's landlord or licensor.
If Company A is a landlord (or licensor) and Company B is its tenant (or licensee) then Company A (or its Group,) will be responsible for the electricity supply, as the landlord and tenant rule "trumps" the Unconsumed Supply rule.
However, if some other arrangement is in place and Company B is not Company A's tenant (or licensor), then Company A will not be responsible for the electricity supply as this qualifies as an Unconsumed Supply. In these circumstances, Company B (or its Group) will be responsible for that electricity supply (assuming it can answer yes to the three questions that determine whether a supply exists for the purposes of the CRC).

Answer to Question 2: Is Company A at risk of enforcement action if Company B also registers?

The section of the CRC Order that deals with civil penalties (Part 14) does not impose a civil penalty if an organisation has registered as a Participant by mistake. So if Company A had correctly registered as a Participant and Company B had also registered in respect of the same electricity supply as Company A, even though it should not have done so, then neither Company A nor Company B should be at risk of a civil penalty.
The section in the CRC Order that deals with criminal penalties (articles 106-107) says that it is a criminal offence for a person (which would include a company) to make a statement which that person knows is false or misleading, or if that person recklessly makes a statement which is false or misleading in a material particular.
So for example, if Company B did not have to register but went ahead and registered anyway, then possibly (but it is not clear cut) it might fall foul of this criminal offence. However, as with any other criminal offence, the Environment Agency has a discretion as to whether it will prosecute and so it might chose not to prosecute Company B, particularly if Company B had (in good faith) misunderstood how the CRC legislation works.
For more information on civil and criminal penalties under the CRC, see Practice note, CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme: enforcement and penalties.

Further information

For more information on:
  • The basics of the CRC, see PLC's training webcast.
  • The CRC in general, see the CRC Survival Kit.

Comments

If you have any comments on this, or any other, Ask the team, please mail the PLC Environment team at [email protected].