ECJ holds additional evidence of use filed after initial time limit was admissible | Practical Law

ECJ holds additional evidence of use filed after initial time limit was admissible | Practical Law

The ECJ has dismissed an appeal against the EU General Court's decision that evidence of use filed in response to a request from OHIM was admissible, even though it was filed after the initial deadline for supplying proof of genuine use. (New Yorker SHK Jeans GmbH & Co. KG v OHIM, Case C 621/11 P, 18 July 2013.)

ECJ holds additional evidence of use filed after initial time limit was admissible

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 9-534-7930 (Approx. 2 pages)

ECJ holds additional evidence of use filed after initial time limit was admissible

by Practical Law IPIT & Communications
Published on 18 Jul 2013 • European Union
The ECJ has dismissed an appeal against the EU General Court's decision that evidence of use filed in response to a request from OHIM was admissible, even though it was filed after the initial deadline for supplying proof of genuine use. (New Yorker SHK Jeans GmbH & Co. KG v OHIM, Case C 621/11 P, 18 July 2013.)