A building used for commercial purposes cannot be a house "reasonably so called" (Supreme Court) | Practical Law

A building used for commercial purposes cannot be a house "reasonably so called" (Supreme Court) | Practical Law

In Day and another v Hosebay Ltd;Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd [2012] UKSC 41, the Supreme Court has reversed the decisions of the Court of Appeal.

A building used for commercial purposes cannot be a house "reasonably so called" (Supreme Court)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 9-521-8363 (Approx. 6 pages)

A building used for commercial purposes cannot be a house "reasonably so called" (Supreme Court)

by PLC Property
Published on 12 Oct 2012 • England, Wales
In Day and another v Hosebay Ltd; Howard de Walden Estates Ltd v Lexgorge Ltd [2012] UKSC 41, the Supreme Court has reversed the decisions of the Court of Appeal.