Swiss Supreme Court reminds petitioners to challenge all alternative reasons on which a particular decision is based | Practical Law

Swiss Supreme Court reminds petitioners to challenge all alternative reasons on which a particular decision is based | Practical Law

In decision 4A_497/2015, the Swiss Supreme Court considered alleged violations of the right to be heard and public policy as well as whether an arbitral tribunal had rightly refused to order a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement to hold a shareholders' meeting.

Swiss Supreme Court reminds petitioners to challenge all alternative reasons on which a particular decision is based

by Dr. Martin Bernet (Partner) and Benjamin Gottlieb (Associate), Schellenberg Wittmer Ltd
Published on 21 Feb 2017 • Switzerland
In decision 4A_497/2015, the Swiss Supreme Court considered alleged violations of the right to be heard and public policy as well as whether an arbitral tribunal had rightly refused to order a non-signatory to the arbitration agreement to hold a shareholders' meeting.