PLC Global Finance update for August 2010: United Kingdom | Practical Law

PLC Global Finance update for August 2010: United Kingdom | Practical Law

The United Kingdom update for August 2010 for the PLC Global Finance multi-jurisdictional monthly e-mail.

PLC Global Finance update for August 2010: United Kingdom

Practical Law UK Articles 6-503-1017 (Approx. 4 pages)

PLC Global Finance update for August 2010: United Kingdom

by Norton Rose LLP
Published on 31 Aug 2010
The United Kingdom update for August 2010 for the PLC Global Finance multi-jurisdictional monthly e-mail.

Government policy

UK consults on fundamental regulatory reform

Simon Lovegrove
According to the UK government, to explain the financial crisis purely in terms of global trends ignores the fundamentally important point that there were real and significant failings in the UK regulatory framework. In particular the UK's regulatory system failed to recognise and respond to the problems that were emerging in the UK's financial system.
In response to these failings, the government has long supported fundamental changes to the UK's regulatory framework, particularly giving the Bank of England (BoE) a greater role.
In July, the government published its first consultation paper on reforming the UK regulatory framework. As expected the paper envisages the Financial Services Authority being replaced by three new authorities:
  • A new Financial Policy Committee (FPC) will be created within the BoE. This will have ultimate authority to identify imbalances, risks and vulnerabilities in the UK financial system and take any necessary action to mitigate these in order to protect the wider UK economy.
  • A new subsidiary of the BoE, the Prudential Regulation Authority or PRA, will be responsible for the authorisation, regulation and day-to-day supervision of all firms that were subject to "significant" prudential regulation. In the consultation paper the government has not defined what it means by "significant" and has simply said that it expects banks, investment banks and insurers to come within the PRA's scope. However, the consultation paper is silent as to whether or not investment management firms will be prudentially regulated by the PRA.
  • A new independent authority, the Consumer Protection and Markets Authority or CPMA, will take responsibility for conduct of business regulation of all financial institutions, whether prudentially regulated by the PRA or not. The CPMA will also write the prudential regulatory framework for firms that were not regulated by the PRA.
The CPMA will also have a strong markets division that will lead on all market conduct regulation and be the lead authority in representing the UK in the new European Securities and Markets Authority. However, the regulation and supervision of settlement systems and central counterparty clearing houses will be dealt with by the BoE. These functions will sit alongside the BoE's existing responsibilities for payment systems oversight.
Whilst the consultation paper can be seen as a foundation paper which sets out the government's core concepts for reform much more detail is needed. A further consultation paper and draft legislation is expected in early 2011. However, even at this early stage by concentrating authority in the BoE, the government is sending a clear message that it intends to create a powerful body with significantly increased influence over the UK's financial system and economy.

Pensions

The Pensions Regulator's determinations panel issued a contribution notice in relation to the Bonas Group Pension Scheme

Lesley Harrold
Employers attempting to avoid defined benefit pension scheme liabilities received a sharp warning from The Pensions Regulator (TPR) when the first contribution notice under the Pensions Act 2004 was issued in June. A Belgian company, VDW, which sold its UK subsidiary under a pre-pack insolvency in 2006 and left its pension liabilities for the Pension Protection Fund, has been ordered by TPR to pay £5.1 million to the UK pension scheme, despite VDW not being a scheme employer.
The power to issue a contribution notice applies where an act or a series of acts causes material detriment to a scheme. TPR's determinations panel considered this issue and then evaluated the main purpose of the act or omission.
The panel also considered whether it was reasonable to impose liability on VDW and its chairman personally.
TPR found:
  • VDW controlled Bonas at all material times.
  • VDW's conclusion that Bonas' business was unsustainable was driven exclusively by the pension liabilities.
  • The adoption of the pre-pack process was planned to retain Bonas' business assets and employees, while establishing a new company without the pension liabilities.
  • VDW concealed its plans from the scheme’s trustees and TPR.
  • VDW was advised that TPR might intervene but chose to run that risk.
The panel concluded the sum sought was reasonable since that amount was required to restore the scheme to solvency. No contribution notice was issued against the chairman.
The main issue for TPR was VDW's decision to conceal its pre-pack plans from both TPR and the trustees. The panel also noted that VDW chose to gamble that an overseas parent company would not be pursued. Companies which do not engage openly with their scheme trustees regarding pension scheme liabilities are likely to become subject to TPR's enforcement action. It is expected that VDW will appeal.

Tax

Double Taxation Treaty Passport Scheme

David Ward
HM Revenue & Customs has launched a Double Taxation Treaty Passport (DTTP) Scheme for overseas corporate lenders, which is intended to simplify and improve the system of applying for double taxation treaty relief on interest payments made by UK borrowers.
An overseas corporate lender in a country with which the UK has a Double Taxation Treaty that includes an interest Article, may apply for a Treaty Passport from HMRC. The scheme is open to overseas corporate lenders only; individuals are not eligible.
Overseas corporate lenders may register now for a Treaty Passport, although the DTTP Scheme will not start until 1 September 2010.
The DTTP Scheme will work as follows:
  • An overseas lender will apply to HMRC for a passport using application form DTTP1. If accepted, the lender will receive a formal letter of acceptance, a unique identifying reference number and will be included on the publicly available register of recognised passport holders.
  • A Treaty Passport will be valid for 5 years, but may be renewed by written application to HMRC four months before its expiry.
  • The lender must inform the borrower of the need to notify HMRC within 30 working days of entry into the loan. The borrower must notify HMRC on form DTTP2, providing details of the passport holder, the main terms and features of the loan, the borrower's contact details and the name and reference number of its tax office.
  • HMRC may issue a direction (usually valid for 5 years) based on the information provided by the borrower in form DTTP2. This will enable the borrower to apply the reduced rate of withholding tax provided by the double tax treaty to the interest payments it makes to the lender under the loan.
While borrowers can search the HMRC database to verify that a lender has been granted passport holder status, they will not be permitted to apply the treaty rate of withholding tax until a direction has been received from HMRC.
The Loan Market Association has published a revised version of its senior multi-currency term and revolving facilities agreement for leveraged finance transactions, which reflects the DTTP Scheme (although it only applies where the treaty provides a full exemption, rather than a reduced rate of withholding tax). It is expected that the DTTP Scheme will improve the process of obtaining clearance for lenders who rely on a double tax treaty for relief from withholding tax. However, for those who do not hold passports, the normal certified claim procedure remains available.