GC Agenda China: November 2015 | Practical Law

GC Agenda China: November 2015 | Practical Law

A look back at the most recent legal developments for general counsel (GC) and their advisers working on China-related matters. GC Agenda China identifies and analyses the key issues that affect businesses, provides insight from leading legal practitioners and professionals, and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.

GC Agenda China: November 2015

Practical Law UK Articles 8-620-6005 (Approx. 10 pages)

GC Agenda China: November 2015

by Brad Herrold, Consultant and Practical Law China
Law stated as at 26 Nov 2015China
A look back at the most recent legal developments for general counsel (GC) and their advisers working on China-related matters. GC Agenda China identifies and analyses the key issues that affect businesses, provides insight from leading legal practitioners and professionals, and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.
The November 2015 edition of GC Agenda China is the twentieth in the series.

Speedread

A look back at the most recent legal developments for general counsel and their advisers working on China-related matters. GC Agenda China identifies and investigates the key issues affecting businesses, provides insight from leading practitioners and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.
This month's GC Agenda covers the:
  • MOFCOM and SAFE's jointly lift of the record filing requirement for foreign investment in real estate.
  • SAIC's launch of a special campaign to protect Disney trade marks.
  • SAIC's digitising of enterprise name registration procedure.
  • State Council's provisional adjustment of the market access to certain service sectors in Beijing.
  • Beijing's implementation of a unified property registration system.
  • Anhui AIC's imposition of fines on Sunyard for failure to cooperate in antitrust investigation.
The November 2015 edition of GC Agenda China is the twentieth in the series.

MOFCOM and SAFE jointly lift record filing requirement for foreign investment in real estate

On 11 November 2015, the Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) jointly issued the Notice on Further Improving the Record-Filing of Foreign Investment in Real Estate (关于进一步改进外商投资房地产备案工作的通知). The notice announced that:
  • Central MOFCOM no longer publishes on its website the names of the foreign-invested real estate enterprises (FIREEs) that have passed the MOFCOM record-filing procedure.
  • FIREEs can apply directly for foreign exchange registration with designated banks and carry out foreign exchange settlement or conversion for capital items once they have obtained establishment approval from the local government. Previously, FIREEs could not proceed with foreign exchange registration until their names were published on the central MOFCOM website.
  • Local MOFCOM is still required to electronically submit project information to central MOFCOM through their internal communication system.
  • Central MOFCOM now runs a quarterly random check of the project information submitted through the internal system. Central MOFCOM is also establishing and publicising a blacklist for those FIREEs found to have breached any existing rules in the course of their applications for project approvals.
The notice effectively abolishes the MOFCOM record-filing procedure, which has been criticised since 2007 as a means of controlling the pace of foreign investment into the real estate sector, and forms part of the Chinese government’s recent efforts to ease restrictions on foreign investment in the real estate sector.
For more information on recent relaxation measures, see Legal update, Restrictions on foreign investment in the real estate sector eased.
For more information on the remaining restrictions still imposed on foreign investment in the real estate sector, see Practice note, Restrictions on foreign investment in the real estate sector: China.

Market reaction

David Blumenfeld, Partner, Paul Hastings, Hong Kong

“This notice is sending a very strong signal that the Chinese central government is taking significant steps to loosen the long-held restrictions on foreign investment in China real estate, and that the government is moving to a regulatory environment where foreign investment in real estate is increasingly treated like foreign investment in other sectors. There are, however, questions yet to be answered. For instance, the notice doesn’t expressly abolish the prohibition that FIREEs are not allowed to incur “foreign debt”. Given the signal sent by this notice, we expect that it is only a matter of time before the Chinese central government (in particular SAFE) issues additional rules expressly allowing FIREEs to incur such foreign debt as the regulation of foreign investment in real estate is treated more like foreign investment in other industries.”

Action items

GC for property development companies and other businesses that invest in China’s real estate market should alert senior management that the restrictions on foreign investment introduced beginning in 2006 are being removed, note that several of the restrictions remain in force, and monitor communications from the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development (MOHURD) and other agencies for signs of further liberalisation.

SAIC launches special campaign to protect Disney trade marks

On 5 November 2015 the State Administration for Industry and Commerce (SAIC) promulgated the Notice on the Launch of a Special Campaign to Protect the Exclusive Use of “迪士尼” Registered Trade Marks (工商总局关于开展保护“迪士尼”注册商标专用权专项行动的通知). The special campaign is cracking down on the infringement of Disney’s registered trade marks from October 2015 to October 2016, that is, immediately before and after the opening of the Shanghai Disney Park during the spring of 2016.
The campaign includes the following key elements:
  • Improving daily supervision of the use of the Disney marks in a “key protection area” in and immediately surrounding Shanghai Disney Resort.
  • Increasing intra-agency cooperation and information exchange in a “joint protection area” in the rest of Shanghai and East China.
  • Establishing a nationwide trade mark infringement case collaboration mechanism and an online trade mark infringement protection mechanism.
  • Implementing a centralized campaign to inspect Disney branded commodities and derivative products, services and performance activities and supervise ancillary activities such as product distribution and advertising, trade mark printing and internet marketing.
  • Providing training for personnel of the SAIC’s subordinate bureaus and other government agencies.
  • Orchestrating a multi-media public education campaign.
  • Strengthening coordination between China’s administrative and judicial organs, as well as collaboration with the Shanghai International Tourism and Resort Area Headquarters and the stakeholders in Shanghai Disney Resort, that is, Disney and the Shen Di Group (a joint venture among four Shanghai based state-owned enterprises (SOEs)).
For information on registering trade marks in China, see Practice note, Trade marks (China): overview.

Market reaction

Jeanette Chan, Partner, Paul Weiss, Hong Kong

“A year-long protection campaign by the SAIC of a specific trademark is virtually unheard of in China, and it demonstrates just how much importance China is placing on the success of the Shanghai Disney Theme Park and its resolve to crack down on counterfeit goods and other IPR infringements. Such IPR protection has been implemented not only for the sake of foreign companies doing business in the country. China also realizes that as it attempts to develop its home grown creative industries, such as music and film production, it must strengthen IPR protection to allow its own industries to flourish. The Disney campaign follows another anti-counterfeit campaign launched by the SAIC in June this year on counterfeits and trademark-infringing products sold on e-commerce platforms. However, IPR infringement is an entrenched problem in China and it remains to be seen whether the Disney campaign will be a success.”

Action items

GC for companies with branded products or services in the China market should ensure that all trade marks are duly registered in China and that registration applications are filed as early as possible. In addition, GCs should consider whether to register the Chinese versions of their marks, even where the Chinese marks do not appear in conjunction with the products or services. If the Chinese marks are registered by third parties, it can be very time consuming to reclaim trade mark rights through cancellation proceedings.

SAIC digitises enterprise name registration procedure

On 15 October, the Foreign Investment Department of the SAIC announced that from 1 November 2015, the registration procedure for enterprise names that require SAIC verification will be fully digitised.
For a newly established enterprise, an applicant will submit its application through SAIC’s online business registration system. After SAIC verification, the relevant department responsible for name registration under the SAIC (the local AIC) will issue the Enterprise Name Pre-verification Notice to the applicant.
For an existing company that wishes to amend its registered name, the local AIC will:
  • Carry out a preliminary inspection of the application.
  • Forward the application to SAIC through the online registration system.
  • Inform the applicant of the results of the verification.
  • Carry out the name registration amendment at the local level.
The new rules also retain the traditional option for pre-verifying the names of foreign-invested enterprises (FIEs), that is, in addition to online reservations, applicants are still permitted to file on-the-spot enterprise pre-verification applications with the local AICs.
For further information on enterprise name registration, see Practice note, Chinese company names.

Market reaction

Gloria Liu, Partner, DLA Piper, Hong Kong

“As part of the Government’s efforts to simplify and digitise administrative procedures, these new rules make reservation of company names more efficient and streamlined. In particular, applicants no longer need to make the initial submission in person, while the SAIC and its local counterparts will internally coordinate on the decision-making process. The special arrangement for foreign investors will ensure a smooth transition to fully digital name reservations.”

Action items

GC for companies with affiliates in China should understand that these procedural changes do not affect the substantive rules on the administration of company names. Foreign investors still need to confirm whether their proposed names are in compliance with the relevant rules and note that a pre-verified name will expire six months after approval.

State Council provisionally adjusts market access to certain service sectors in Beijing

On 27 October 2015 the State Council issued the Decision on Provisionally Adjusting the Administrative Approval and Special Administrative Measures for Market Access in Beijing (关于在北京市暂时调整有关行政审批 和准入特别管理措施的决定). The decision requires the relevant administrative departments at the national and Beijing municipal levels to promptly amend the administrative approval and market access rules that apply to foreign investment in the cultural performance, civil aviation and travel industries in Beijing.
The decision permits the establishment of the following businesses in Beijing until 5 May 2018:
  • Wholly foreign-owned enterprises (WFOEs) that provide performance agency services in Beijing.
  • Sino-foreign equity and cooperative joint venture enterprises with foreign investors as the controlling shareholders that provide airplane maintenance services.
  • Sino-foreign equity joint venture companies (EJVs) that provide travel agency services for domestic Chinese travel abroad (and travel to Hong Kong and Macau).
The changes mirror the policies adopted in the 2015 Negative List for the four China pilot free trade zones or adopted in the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone (Shanghai FTZ). The policy outside of these areas is more restrictive. The State Council reserves the right to amend the policy changes contained in the decision when the trial period concludes.
For more information on the 2015 Negative List, see Practice note, China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone: overview.
For a table comparing foreign investment policy in the Shanghai FTZ and the rest of China, see Checklist, Comparing of policy in the China (Shanghai) Pilot Free Trade Zone and the rest of China.

Market reaction

Robert Lewis, Senior Counsel, Zhong Lun Law Firm, Beijing

“The decision is in line with the broader transformation of China’s economy, and we expect future opening in regard to the technology services, financial service, commerce, education and health care sectors, which together with the changes contained in the decision should boost foreign investment in these sectors in Beijing in the near term.”

Action items

GC for companies that engage in the tourism, airplane maintenance and culture sectors may wish to examine if these changes offer meaningful new opportunities in Beijing. GC for companies that operate in the technology services, financial service, commerce, education and health care sectors also may wish to enquire with the authorities in Beijing to determine if and when new opportunities are available.

Beijing implements unified property registration system

On 6 November 2015, the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources (Beijing BLR) and the Beijing Municipal Commission of Housing and Urban-Rural Development Committee jointly issued the Notice on Matters concerning Implementing a Unified Registration System for Real Property (关于实施不动产统一登记制度有关事项的通告).
The notice announced that for registration applications submitted on or after 9 November 2015, that:
  • Beijing has launched a uniform registration system for real property (including land, buildings, forests and other fixtures).
  • One registration agency, the Beijing BLR, is now responsible for registering all types of real property. The only exception is in relation to the right to contractual management of rural land which has been granted a five-year transition period before inclusion into the new system.
  • A new form of title certificate, that is, the real property ownership certificate is now issued on registration.
  • Existing land certificates and building ownership certificates are still valid until any change of ownership, which would trigger a new registration under the new system.
This notice forms part of Beijing's implementation of the Interim Regulations on Real Estate Registration 2014, which required a unified property registration system to be established across the country by 2020. Before this move by Beijing, the new system had been launched in pilot cities including Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Zhongshan, Qingdao and Xiamen.
For more information on the national real property registration programme, see GC Agenda: April 2015.

Market reaction

Rico Chan, Partner, Baker & McKenzie, Hong Kong

“Beijing’s swift action is a strong signal of the Central Government’s drive to implement the unified real estate registration system across China. The way Beijing chose to implement the new system will likely influence other cities. We expect to see more cities following the suit shortly.”

Action items

GC may wish to keep a close eye on the rollout of the new system as it affects not only the perfection of security over immovable assets but also any company that acquires or leases offices in China. All GC responsible for China operations should familiarise themselves with the property search procedures to determine whether any prior mortgage or prior lease has been registered against their proposed China office.

Anhui AIC fines Sunyard for failure to cooperate in antitrust investigation

On 13 October 2015 the provincial level AIC in Anhui (Anhui AIC) announced it had fined Sunyard Systems Engineering Co., Ltd. (Sunyard) RMB 200,000 for “refusing to provide relevant materials to an anti-monopoly enforcement agency” during the Anhui AIC’s investigation in relation to unspecified antitrust violations by Sunyard. The Anhui AIC issued an Administrative Penalty Decision, which cited violations of Article 42 of the Anti-Monopoly Law of the People’s Republic of China 2007 and Article 14 of the Provisions on the Procedures for the Administrative Organs for Industry and Commerce to Investigate Cases Concerning Monopoly Agreements and Abuses of Dominant Market Positions 2009.
According to the decision, the Anhui AIC initiated the investigation in February 2015 and formally requested Sunyard to submit copies of relevant agreements, accounts, correspondence, electronic data and other materials in June 2015 and again in July 2015. Instead of complying with the requests, Sunyard provided a statement that it had not engaged in any monopolistic conduct. After Sunyard filed an application to abandon an administrative penalty hearing, the Anhui AIC:
  • Imposed the fine.
  • Informed Sunyard that if it failed to pay the fine within 15 days it would compel payment, plus three percent daily interest, in a People’s Court.
  • Informed Sunyard that it could appeal the decision to the SAIC or the Anhui People’s Government or directly file a suit in a People’s Court.
For a guide to China’s rules prohibiting abuse of dominance, see Country Q&A, Restraints of trade and dominance in China: overview.

Market reaction

Andy Huang, Anti-trust lawyer, Hogan Lovells, Beijing

“The matter appears to be the first published case in a separate decision where a fine was imposed for failing to comply with an antitrust investigation in China, and confirms the enforcement powers of China’s antitrust agencies. It also shows the need for companies to comply with China’s regulatory requirements, antitrust in particular, in order to avoid exposure to negative financial or reputational consequences.”

Action items

GC should take steps to understand and ensure compliance with China’s rules prohibiting restraints of trade. Counsel also should educate senior management of the risks of an external (that is, government led) investigation and work with senior management to develop and implement policies and procedures for dealing with external investigations.