An order for possession under the non-secure tenancy regime must be proportionate (Supreme Court) | Practical Law

An order for possession under the non-secure tenancy regime must be proportionate (Supreme Court) | Practical Law

On 23 February 2011, the Supreme Court held in London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, that the principles in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, applied where an order for possession was sought under the homelessness and introductory tenancy regimes.

An order for possession under the non-secure tenancy regime must be proportionate (Supreme Court)

Practical Law UK Legal Update Case Report 2-504-9646 (Approx. 8 pages)

An order for possession under the non-secure tenancy regime must be proportionate (Supreme Court)

by PLC Public Sector
Published on 28 Feb 2011 • England, Wales
On 23 February 2011, the Supreme Court held in London Borough of Hounslow v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, that the principles in Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2010] UKSC 45, applied where an order for possession was sought under the homelessness and introductory tenancy regimes.