Bakersfield Entertainment Limited v Church and another UKEAT/0523/05/ZT. | Practical Law

Bakersfield Entertainment Limited v Church and another UKEAT/0523/05/ZT. | Practical Law

The EAT held that a tribunal had erred in holding that two contracts of employment were not illegal when the employees concerned had agreed to set up a scheme whereby 50% of their salary was paid gross to fictitious service providers and not declared for tax and NI. Read more.

Bakersfield Entertainment Limited v Church and another UKEAT/0523/05/ZT.

Practical Law Resource ID 1-375-8522 (Approx. 2 pages)

Bakersfield Entertainment Limited v Church and another UKEAT/0523/05/ZT.

by PLC Employment
Published on 04 Nov 2005England, Scotland, Wales
The EAT held that a tribunal had erred in holding that two contracts of employment were not illegal when the employees concerned had agreed to set up a scheme whereby 50% of their salary was paid gross to fictitious service providers and not declared for tax and NI. Read more.