GC Agenda China: November 2017 | Practical Law

GC Agenda China: November 2017 | Practical Law

A look back at the most recent legal developments for general counsel (GC) and their advisers working on China-related matters. GC Agenda China identifies and analyses the key issues that affect businesses, provides insight from leading legal practitioners and professionals, and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.

GC Agenda China: November 2017

Practical Law UK Articles w-011-7871 (Approx. 8 pages)

GC Agenda China: November 2017

by Brad Herrold, Consultant and Practical Law China
Law stated as at 29 Nov 2017
A look back at the most recent legal developments for general counsel (GC) and their advisers working on China-related matters. GC Agenda China identifies and analyses the key issues that affect businesses, provides insight from leading legal practitioners and professionals, and gives specific and actionable guidance in response to these issues.

NPC enacts revised Anti-unfair Competition Law

On 4 November 2017, the National People's Congress (NPC) Standing Committee enacted a revised version of the Anti-unfair Competition Law of the People's Republic of China, which will take effect 1 January 2018.
The revised law is aimed at keeping pace with changes in China's commercial environment and legal regime. It includes the following changes from the original 1993 law:
  • Consumer protection. The definition of "unfair competition" is expanded to expressly include acts that undermine the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.
  • Redundant and conflicting rules. Rules have been removed that prescribe specific anti-competitive acts, but that are governed under other, more specific laws.
  • Intellectual property. The revised law also removes trade mark protections, which are governed by the Trademark Law of the People's Republic of China 2013, and refines the offence of passing off by prohibiting the use of another business operator's logo, trade name or domain name, or an individual's name, or any similar act that is likely to cause confusion in the market.
  • Commercial bribery. Commercial bribery is defined as an offer of property (or other means) to an employee or advisor of a counterparty, or an entity or individual with influence over a transaction, to seek a transaction opportunity or competitive advantage. Liability is imposed on an employer for the bribery acts of its employees, unless the employer can prove that the employee's acts were irrelevant to the transaction opportunity or competitive advantage.
  • E-commerce. New offences are created prohibiting acts that obstruct or disrupt the lawful provision of products or services over the internet. All other offences of unfair competition are expressly applied to violations committed over the internet.
  • Promotional activities. Various refinements are made to the prohibitions against false and misleading commercial promotions and third parties who facilitate these activities, and the protections and offences involving the offer of prizes to induce sales.
  • Trade secrets. The definition of "trade secret" is changed to include information with a commercial value that is not known to the public. The offence is expanded to include current and former employees or other entities or individuals who improperly obtain a trade secret.
  • Investigations. The revised law expands and clarifies the investigative powers of administrative agencies and expands the protections and specifies the procedures for supporting whistleblowers.
  • Liability. The revised law enhances the enforcement powers of administrative agencies by increasing the amount and range of administrative penalties and requiring the public shaming of offenders and provides a legal basis for mitigating or eliminating administrative punishment in some circumstances.
For more coverage of this development, see Legal update, NPC enacts revised Anti-unfair Competition Law.

Market reaction

Paul McKenzie, Partner, Morrison & Foerster, Beijing and Shanghai

"The revisions to the AUCL are very far-reaching. They modernise the law in various respects, providing greater focus on protecting consumers, expressly addressing online conduct, reducing the overlap between the AUCL and the Anti-Monopoly Law, and offering greater guidance on damages payable by one business operator to another for acts of unfair competition. Among the most widely discussed changes are those involving commercial bribery, which is no longer limited to acts associated with the sale of goods and services. The liability for acts of employees is clearer than under the original statute. Moreover, penalties have been dramatically increased. The new AUCL may help create a more competitive environment for international companies, but it will also create new compliance challenges."

Action items

GC for any company with operations in China will want to review the revised law in view of current internal procedures and controls, particularly in relation to the changes involving commercial bribery, promotional activities and trade secrets, as well as the new offences related to e-commerce.

NDRC and other agencies establish a fair competition review system

On 23 October 2017, the National Reform and Development Commission (NDRC), together with various other government agencies, issued the Implementing Rules for the Fair Competition Review System (Interim), with immediate effect.
The rules implement the Opinions of the State Council on Establishing a Fair Competition Review System during the Development of a Market-oriented System 2016 and require China's policy-making organs to conduct a fair competition review (review) when formulating a policy measure that involves market access, industrial development, government procurement and so on. A policy measure includes measures such as regulations, normative documents and qualification standards.
A policy measure may not be promulgated if the review indicates that it excludes or restricts competition.
Policy-making organs are also required to:
  • Prepare and archive written reports on each review.
  • Conduct periodic assessments after a policy measure is issued to determine its impact on competition and the relevant national market.
In conducting a review, a policy-making organ is required to consult interested parties such as the operators involved in the relevant market, upstream and downstream operators and consumers. The organ also may seek advice from experts, scholars, professional advisors, industry associations and members of the public, but is required to include the results of those consultations in its report.
In conducting a review, a policy measure must comply with the following standards that prohibit various kinds of restrictive and discriminatory policies:
  • Market entry and exit standards.
  • Standards on the free circulation of goods and services.
  • Standards that affect production and operating costs.
  • Standards that affect production and operating behaviour.
Subject to certain conditions, the implementing rules allow for the following exclusions from these standards in relation to policy measures that:
  • Protect national economic security, cultural security or national defence.
  • Alleviate poverty, provide disaster relief or protect the environment.
  • Protect other public interests.

Market reaction

Philip Cheng, Partner, Hogan Lovells, Shanghai

"The fair market review system, initiated in 2016 when the State Council issued the opinions, furthers two parallel trends we have witnessed during the Xi era: the re-establishment of the rule of law, and the emerging primacy of market forces in the economy. Both are welcome developments, though, as with any new policy development in China, the true measure of progress will lie in its enforcement from on high and its implementation at the local level."

Action items

No specific action is required as a result of this development.

PBOC revises measures on pledges of accounts receivable

On 25 October 2017, the People's Bank of China (PBOC) issued a revised version of the Measures on the Registration of Pledges over Accounts Receivable, which will take effect 1 December 2017.
The measures were originally issued in 2007, and the revised measures include the following changes:
  • Amending the list of illustrative examples of creditors' rights in the definition of "accounts receivable" to include examples of specific types of services (and a different set of examples of infrastructure projects) and catch-all clauses to cover the proceeds to all types of infrastructure and public utility projects and all other monetised, contract-based creditors' rights.
  • Adding a definition of "pledge over accounts receivable". The definition is tied to Article 223 of the Property Law of the People's Republic of China 2007 and refers to situations where a debtor or a third party pledges to pay, as a security for an underlying debt, to a creditor on a priority basis the proceeds from specific accounts receivable the creditor holds, in the event that the debtor fails to satisfy the underlying debt or any other pre-agreed circumstance occurs.
  • Expanding the scope of the registration system to include assignments of accounts receivable, if the purpose of the assignment is for financing.
  • Updating the list of contents of a pledge registration to include the pledgee and pledgor's unified social credit code and global legal entity identifier.
  • Adjusting the valid registration period of a pledge over accounts receivable, as well as any extensions to the validity period, to between six months and 30 years, determined in accordance with the performance period for the underlying debt.
  • Revising the procedures for a pledgor or other interested party to challenge the contents of a pledge registration by requiring them to provide notice within seven days of registering an objection and to file suit or apply for arbitration within 30 days of registering an objection, and clarifying that they bear liability if they cause damage by providing false materials in relation to a pledge registration.

Market reaction

Allen Ng, Partner Baker & McKenzie, Hong Kong

"The revised measures accommodate the fast-growing receivables financing market in China by expanding the scope of receivables that can now be pledged and extending the term of a registration. These moves should lessen administrative burdens and encourage financiers to take pledges of receivables as security in large-scale infrastructure or public projects and other transactions."

Action items

GC for clients involved in financing or securing a broad range of monetised contractual rights, ranging from fixed assets like real estate, utilities and infrastructure projects to service agreements and licences of intellectual property rights, should be become familiar with the revised measures.

Shenzhen revises QFLP rules to strengthen management

On 22 September 2017, the Shenzhen Municipal People's Government issued the Pilot Measures of Shenzhen Municipality on Foreign-invested Equity Investment Enterprises, with immediate effect.
The programme, which was first implemented in Shanghai in 2011 and then introduced to other cities including Shenzhen, permits foreign-invested equity investment enterprises (foreign-invested funds) and foreign invested equity investment management enterprises (foreign-invested fund managers), commonly known as qualified foreign limited partnerships (QFLP), to invest in domestic non-public trading enterprise equity. QFLP enterprises are funded through private foreign and domestic fund raising.
The Shenzhen pilot measures revise and replace the city's previous interim measures issued in 2012 and the related operating procedures released in 2013.
Compared to the prior rules, the pilot measures clarify the following issues:
  • Registration requirements. Foreign-invested funds and their foreign-invested fund managers must be registered in Shenzhen. The pilot measures also clarify the process and timing for registration, as well as preliminary reviews of registration applications by the municipal market and quality supervision commission and the municipal finance bureau.
  • Choice of vehicle. Foreign-invested fund managers may be established as wholly foreign-owned enterprises or Sino-foreign equity joint ventures, as well as foreign-invested partnership enterprises. Foreign-invested funds must be established as foreign-invested partnership enterprises.
  • Business scope. Foreign-invested fund managers are permitted to manage foreign-invested funds, as well as domestic private equity and venture capital funds, but are prohibited from directly investing in projects. Qualified domestic-invested fund managers are permitted to manage foreign-invested funds. Foreign-invested funds must invest in accordance with the foreign investment catalogue, may only invest in industry projects directly, and may not invest in so-called "fund of funds" or other indirect investment targets. (For more information on the foreign investment catalogue, see Article, 2017 foreign investment catalogue: the debut of nationwide negative list in China.)
  • Investor qualifications and restrictions. The pilot measures clarify the qualifications thresholds for foreign investors and stipulate the qualifications requirements for domestic investors. Where a general partner and a limited partner in a foreign-invested fund have a common controlling shareholder, capital contributions from the common shareholder are capped at 50%.
For more coverage of this development, see Legal update, Shenzhen revises QFLP rules to strengthen management.

Market reaction

Natasha Xie, Partner, Junhe, Shanghai

"The amended pilot measures seem intended to plug loopholes that circumvent the current regulatory requirements on both capital inflow and fundraising. QFLP fund investments must be targeted at specific non-financial industry equity projects, as opposed to financial products or shell companies, and investments in other funds and fund managers are expressly prohibited. The 50% cap on contributions by common shareholders means that QFLP funds must raise funds from third-party investors in addition to their own capital contributions."

Action items

GC for a foreign entity or individual investing (or considering investing) in a QFLP in Shenzhen will want to closely study the revised pilot measures and seek specialist advice to ensure compliance with the tightened rules on capital inflow and fundraising and to identify new opportunities for foreign-invested fund managers.

NDRC circulates new draft rules on outbound investment

On 3 November 2017, the NDRC circulated for public comment the Administrative Measures for Outbound Investment by Enterprises (Draft to Solicit Comments)).
The draft measures are based on and will replace the Administrative Measures for the Verification and Approval and Record-Filing of Outbound Investment Projects 2014 (2014 NDRC Measures). (For information on the current regulatory framework for obtaining approvals for outbound investment, see Practice note, China outbound investment: approvals and process.)
The draft measures aim to streamline the NDRC's oversight of outbound direct investment (ODI) and ensure that Chinese investment is targeted at industries and assets that benefit China and safeguard China's national interest and national security. They include the following changes from the 2014 NDRC Measures:
  • Expanded scope. The outbound investment regime expressly applies to financial enterprises and non-financial enterprises and incorporates the concept of control to include investment carried out by an offshore entity under an onshore entity’s control. In addition, the draft measures apply to the outbound investments of overseas enterprises or enterprises in Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan that are controlled by mainland Chinese natural persons. ODI by Chinese natural persons are not covered under the draft measures.
  • Simplified approval procedure. The separate procedure involving submission of a project information report for projects with domestic investment of USD300 million or above is no longer required. The requirements for approval and record-filing are also changed. Approval is now required only for sensitive projects directly or in-directly invested in by domestic enterprises, and the definitions of "sensitive countries and regions" and "sensitive industries" are revised. Record-filing is required for non-sensitive projects directly invested in by domestic enterprises. Investors may directly carry out record-filing with the NDRC or its local counterpart without obtaining preliminary approval. For any non-sensitive indirect investment of USD300 million or above, investors are only required to submit a project information reporting form through the NDRC designated online platform.
  • Deadline for obtaining approval or record-filing extended to transaction completion. Investors must obtain approval or complete record-filing prior to implementing an outbound investment project, but are not prohibited from concluding a binding agreement before obtaining these documents. The validity period for approval and record-filing is extended to two years on all outbound projects.
  • Change of approval or record-filing. The situations where an application to amend an approval or record-filing are clarified, and deadlines for official written decisions on these applications are specified.
  • Unfair competition and enforcement. A provision against unfair competition is included, as are increased disciplinary measures and new public shaming measures.
Comments on the draft may be submitted to NDRC until 3 December 2017.

Market reaction

Calvin Chiu, Counsel, Dentons, Beijing
"The draft measures are consistent with the government's efforts to "delegate power and streamline procedures" in ODI regulation. The various procedural improvements provide greater predictability and fewer administrative burdens for practitioners and clients, for example, by clarifying the scope of sensitive regions and industries, expressly including company and PE fund formation within the domain of ODI regulation, and removing the separate project information report requirement. That said, in assessing the approvals procedure for any specific ODI project the draft measures should be read in conjunction with the Guiding Opinions Further Guiding and Regulating the Directions of Outbound Investment 2017."

Action items

GC for companies involved in any outbound direct investment project should carefully study the draft measures and the recent policy guidelines as the proposed changes are significant and could impact the feasibility of a project, as well as the timing and procedural hurdles involved. Counsel also may wish to discuss with government relations colleagues and external advisors when considering the implications for related projects.