Personal accountability: FCA and PRA consult on new regime | Practical Law

Personal accountability: FCA and PRA consult on new regime | Practical Law

The Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulatory Authority have published a joint consultation paper, which looks at the new regulatory regime that will apply to individuals working in banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms. The new regime is intended to make it easier for firms and regulators to hold individuals to account.

Personal accountability: FCA and PRA consult on new regime

Practical Law UK Articles 4-578-8445 (Approx. 4 pages)

Personal accountability: FCA and PRA consult on new regime

by Christopher Robinson and Sarah Robinson, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP
Published on 28 Aug 2014United Kingdom
The Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulatory Authority have published a joint consultation paper, which looks at the new regulatory regime that will apply to individuals working in banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms. The new regime is intended to make it easier for firms and regulators to hold individuals to account.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) have published a joint consultation paper, which looks at the new regulatory regime that will apply to individuals working in banks, building societies and PRA-designated investment firms (the consultation).
The new regime replaces the approved persons regime for banking firms with a senior managers regime for directors and other senior individuals, and a certification regime applying to more junior employees (see box "Background to the consultation"). In addition, the FCA and the PRA will each issue new conduct rules, replacing the existing statements of principle and code of practice for approved persons.
The new regime is intended to make it easier for firms and regulators to hold individuals to account. Compliance with the new regime will involve, among other things, changes to the ways in which individuals receive authorisation to work at banks, and changes to the way in which banks allocate responsibilities, which could have an impact on governance structures.

Scope

Under the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013, the new regime will apply to:
  • UK-incorporated banks, building societies and credit unions.
  • UK-incorporated PRA-designated investment firms (together, banks).
In addition, the Treasury intends to consult on a proposed extension of the regime to UK branches of overseas banks. The FCA proposes to consult on that issue once the outcome of the Treasury consultation is known.

Senior managers regime

The FCA and the PRA have proposed that the new senior managers regime will cover members of a bank's board, and the FCA envisages that executive committee members (that is, the layer of management below board level) will also be covered.
Other individuals falling within the senior managers regime include:
  • Heads of key business areas.
  • Individuals in group and parent companies who exercise significant influence on decision making.
  • Individuals who are responsible for important business, control or conduct-focused functions.
Senior managers will have to be pre-approved by the FCA or the PRA. The FCA and the PRA propose that individuals who have been authorised as approved persons and who fall within the scope of the senior managers regime will be "grandfathered", meaning that they will not need to obtain further approval to perform the equivalent senior management function.
The application for approval must be accompanied by a statement of responsibilities setting out the areas of the bank for which that person will be responsible. This must be updated and resubmitted to the relevant regulator whenever there is a significant change in a person's responsibilities.
The consultation also proposes to require banks to prepare a responsibilities map setting out their framework for the allocation of responsibilities and their management and governance arrangements. Banks will be required to maintain and update responsibilities maps as necessary and a bank's board will have to confirm to the regulators annually that there are no gaps in its allocation of responsibilities.
Under the definition of misconduct, for which the regulators can hold individuals liable, the burden of proof is reversed so that if a regulatory contravention occurs in an area of the business for which a particular senior manager is responsible, he will be guilty of misconduct unless he can show that he took such steps as a person in his position could reasonably be expected to take to avoid the contravention occurring (or continuing).
In light of this additional ground of liability for senior managers, the statement of responsibility for senior managers will be important in defining their potential liability. The drafting and maintenance of statements of responsibilities and responsibilities maps will therefore require a great deal of care by banks and the individuals concerned in view of the potential consequences should there be a regulatory contravention or failure within a senior manager's area of responsibility.

Certification regime

The certification regime will apply to employees performing a role that is not a senior manager role but, in the PRA's or the FCA's view, poses the risk of significant harm to the bank or its customers, including those employees who are certain material risk takers. It will cover a broader group of individuals than those covered by the approved persons regime.
In practice, the certification regime will apply to a wide range of individuals including: employees accountable to the board for risk management, compliance and audit; heads of legal and finance; employees able to commit the bank to significant transactions; and employees whose remuneration meets certain thresholds.
Banks will be required to certify to the FCA and the PRA that employees subject to the certification regime are fit and proper to carry out their functions. The FCA and the PRA propose that banks should have a 12-month period from the start of the certification regime to issue individuals their first certificate of fitness and propriety. The consultation sets out proposals as to the evidence that banks will be required to collect as part of their assessment process. For new employees, banks will be required to undertake significant due diligence, including obtaining employer references and information about unspent criminal convictions.

Conduct rules

The new PRA conduct rules and FCA conduct rules will be substantially similar to each other (although two rules, dealing with fair treatment of customers and proper standards of market conduct, will be FCA conduct rules only). The conduct rules will draw on the existing statements of principle for approved persons so the changes to banks' compliance procedures and manuals should be limited.
The PRA conduct rules will apply only to senior managers and individuals within the PRA's certification regime.
The FCA conduct rules will apply to all employees other than those who perform a role that is not specific to a bank's financial services business (for example, personal assistants and receptionists).
Banks will be required to notify the relevant regulator if they take disciplinary action against a person for breach of the conduct rules or if they know of, or suspect, a breach.
Christopher Robinson is a partner, and Sarah Robinson is an associate, in the financial institutions disputes group at Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP.
The consultation is at www.bankofengland.co.uk/pra/Documents/publications/cp/2014/cp1414.pdf and closes on 31 October 2014.

Background to the consultation

The new regime derives from recommendations made by the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards (PCBS). The PCBS was established in June 2012, in the wake of the investigations into banks fixing the London Interbank Offered Rate, to conduct an inquiry into professional standards and culture in UK banks and to make recommendations for legislative and other action.
In its June 2013 report, "Changing banking for good", the PCBS found that under the approved persons regime there was little realistic prospect of effective enforcement action against individuals (www.practicallaw.com/8-534-9185). This was for a number of reasons, but principally because responsibilities were not in practice attributed to individuals, and too narrow a set of individuals fell within the scope of regulation. The PCBS also found the current statements of principle and code of practice for approved persons to be incomplete and unclear in their application.
The PCBS report recommended that a new framework be introduced for individuals working in banks, to make individuals, especially at the most senior levels, personally responsible and to reinforce banks' responsibility for their own safety and soundness and the maintenance of standards. The framework for the new regime is set out in the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013.