Practical Law China: what to expect in 2022 | Practical Law

Practical Law China: what to expect in 2022 | Practical Law

Practitioners from a sampling of top-tier international and domestic firms give their views on the major legal developments they foresee in China in 2022 and how these developments will impact their practice going forward.

Practical Law China: what to expect in 2022

Practical Law UK Articles w-034-2648 (Approx. 12 pages)

Practical Law China: what to expect in 2022

by Brad Herrold and Practical Law China
Published on 29 Jan 2022China
Practitioners from a sampling of top-tier international and domestic firms give their views on the major legal developments they foresee in China in 2022 and how these developments will impact their practice going forward.
We asked a select panel of China law practitioners across a broad range of practice areas for their views on the major legal developments they foresee in China in 2022 – and for their predictions on how these changes will impact their own practice over the next few years.

How will the amended Anti-Monopoly Law and new supervision authority impact anti-trust practice?

Competition law was an active practice area in 2021, with several high-profile enforcement actions involving online platforms and the creation of a new, elevated anti-monopoly regulatory agency, the National Anti-Monopoly Bureau (NAMB). Practitioners expect supervision efforts to expand in 2022, along with a major legislative development, the adoption of an amended Anti-Monopoly Law (AML). A recent draft contained new and increased penalties, including punitive fines and penalties for responsible individuals, an expanded scope and a policy shift toward enforcement only where a violation actually harms competition.
"In 2022, we expect the amended AML to provide further legal clarity to companies. On the one hand, substantive prohibitions will be expanded (for example, hub-and-spoke arrangements are explicitly captured) and penalties for missed filings and non-cooperation in investigations will increase; on the other hand, the 'safe harbour' rules, if finally adopted, should provide companies some comfort with respect to their commercial practices. While the level of enforcement will increase as the elevated and expanded NAMB is now better equipped to pursue wrongdoings, the authority also encourages and provides pro-active guidance to companies on putting in place effective compliance programs to prevent infringements from occurring in the first place."
Liao, Xi, Linklaters Zhao Sheng, Beijing
Practitioners expect the NAMB to receive a significant expansion of resources at the central and provincial levels, followed by an increase in administrative supervision, as well as an increase in private civil litigation, with larger damages awards.
"For 2022, we expect the government to continue beefing up the new anti-trust authority, the NAMB, and its provincial offices. The increase in staff is noteworthy (perhaps doubling current numbers), but we think new developments could bring a dynamic leading to a considerably higher headcount. In terms of enforcement, the draft of the amended AML sets out a list of sectors where anti-trust enforcement could be conducted, and the new NAMB head indicated the industries relevant to people's livelihood and the tech, financial and media industries as enforcement priorities in merger review. We also expect there to be more private anti-trust litigation. The damages awards in the IP sector have risen over the past few years, and we could see a similar development in the anti-trust field. If there is a leading court judgment, a flurry of lawsuits could be filed."
Adrian Emch, Hogan Lovells, Beijing
Lawyers also anticipate issuance of detailed administrative and judicial guidance to flesh out the terms of the amended AML, as well as progress in the government's ability to address complex enforcement issues.
"In terms of legislation, we expect the promulgation of more implementing rules to provide detailed guidance on application of the to-be-amended AML. In addition, the Supreme People's Court is likely to publish a set of judicial interpretations to clarify the rules on 'burden of proof', the determination of competition harm and compensation and other hot issues in anti-trust civil litigation. In terms of law enforcement, the NAMB will take an even more active and aggressive approach in supervising and penalizing anti-monopoly behaviour. In particular, digital economy, financial and healthcare and other so-called sectors related to people's daily lives, like automobiles and consumer products, will still be the major enforcement priority. Also, the NAMB is well prepared to challenge some complicated anti-trust cases such as abuses of intellectual property rights, big data related monopolies and various types of exclusive dealing. Furthermore, anti-trust civil litigation will be increasing in the coming year."
Michael Gu, AnJie Law Firm, Beijing

Will increased clarity come to China's new data privacy and security regime?

Developments in data privacy and security also garnered significant attention in 2021, with the passage of two major pillars of China's data privacy and security regime (that is, the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) and Data Security Law (DSL)). The typically broad language of the new laws, plus the lack of detailed implementing rules, presented companies with complex compliance challenges. China's cyber security regulator, the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), and other agencies also circulated an array of draft rules aimed at implementing the new laws, and practitioners expect many of these to be issued in final form in 2022.
"The long-awaited PIPL and DSL finally took effect in 2021, providing a framework for data protection and data security in China. To implement these high-level requirements, multiple draft regulations were also released in 2021 for public comment, including the draft Network Data Security Regulations, which cover a wide array of topics, in November and the draft Measures for the Security Assessment of Cross-border Data Transfers, which identify the data processing entities that must apply for a security assessment before transferring data outside China, in late October. Drafts of the Cybersecurity Review Measures and the Provisions on the Management of Internet Algorithmic Recommendation for Internet Information Services were finalized in the first days of 2022, and we expect other regulators to pass more implementing regulations in 2022, including those related to the security assessment and the standard contractual clauses for cross-border data transfers."
Luo, Yan, Covington & Burling, Beijing
Practitioners view certain implementing rules as particularly relevant to clients, including those on data classification and the emerging cross-border data transfer regime. They also expect various industry regulators to issue rules that apply to companies operating within their sectoral purview, followed by an uptick in enforcement activities by the CAC, industry regulators and law enforcement agencies.
"2022 is the key year for implementing the PIPL and DSL. In the new year, we expect more detailed rules to be published and implemented in relation to cross-border data transfers, data classification and important data, data security review and related filings and critical information infrastructure. Multinationals should pay special attention to regulations relevant to the cross-border data transfer regime, in particular, the thresholds for data localization and the governmental assessment procedures. Sectoral regulators also will play a more prominent role in data protection and publish their own rules. Key regulators to watch include the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the central bank and financial regulators, and the health regulator. Enforcement will ensue in areas where the implementing rules have become effective and will continue in areas such as mobile apps."
James Gong, Bird & Bird, Beijing
Once the new implementing rules are in place, lawyers expect a flurry of administrative investigations and enforcement actions to ensure companies establish and adhere to related internal compliance measures, including security assessments and the use of the CAC's standard contract for third-party data processors.
"In 2021, the PIPL and DSL came into force, and several implementing regulations and related drafts were released. We expect to see more detailed regulations that further implement the DSL and PIPL in 2022, especially in relation to identifying important data, such as the specific requirements for various security assessments, and cross-border data transfers, such as a standard contract for overseas, third-party data processors. We expect the initial wave of regulatory inspections and enforcement cases to occur in late 2022, when detailed implementing regulations might be in force and companies should have had sufficient time to update their internal controls and compliance systems."
Samuel Yang, AnJie Law Firm, Beijing

Will China continue to offer attractive foreign investment opportunities?

The COVID-19 pandemic and China's zero tolerance and quarantine policies have imposed difficulties in implementing foreign investment projects for the past two years. However, the government continued its sustained effort to attract foreign capital, technology and talent in industry sectors essential to its development plans. It also pressed ahead with various rectification campaigns and other policies to limit foreign influence in sectors perceived to threaten society and stability.
"Cross-border investment is unlikely to fully bounce back before 2023. Many investments take time to realise and the pipeline may be a little empty, as COVID has cut China off from the world for two years and cross-border investments need face to face interactions, not ZOOM calls. China will remain, however, very open to (indeed thirsty for) foreign investment. The hot sectors are likely to be digital, consumer facing products (especially cosmetics), fertility and health related businesses. We expect to see more foreign tech companies joint venturing in China, as it is a market too big to ignore but too difficult to go it alone. The digital wall between China and the West will complicate but not block such forays and collaboration. The not-so-hot sectors will be education and anything perceived as potentially having a negative impact on society (ranging from alcohol to gaming)."
Mark Schaub, King & Wood Mallesons, London
Lawyers view the latest negative lists for foreign investment, which took effect on 1 January 2022, as continuing the trend toward increasing market access and reducing related restrictions and conditions, especially in the areas of new and emerging industries and high-end manufacturing. They also see other encouraging signs, including a draft amendment to the Company Law that would offer shareholders more flexible structuring and financing options.
"As the Chinese government continues to develop a more liberal and flexible foreign direct investment regime in 2022, foreign investors have already seen a further shortening of the negative lists and can expect a modernized Company Law (with more freedom in capital contributions and shareholding, an expedited capital reduction procedure and more international corporate governance structures), a clearer regulatory approach toward VIE structures and a further relaxed foreign exchange policy that offers foreign investors significant financing flexibility. In terms of attractive sectors for foreign investment, high and new technologies, high-end manufacturing, new and emerging industries, financial services and telecommunications all should benefit from favourable national and local policies and incentives. In short, in 2022 we expect that China will continue to lower the market entry threshold for foreign investors to enter into the country and will materialize its welcome statements into tangible policies."
Vincent Wang, Global Law Office, Shanghai

What are the main challenges to foreign investment and trade in 2022?

Practitioners believe that recent actions taken by Western governments, and the US in particular, to counter China's growing influence, high import tariffs and market access restrictions, as well as China's corresponding actions to block or retaliate against these foreign actions, including the enactment of the Anti-Foreign Sanctions Law in 2021, will continue to pose significant challenges for foreign investment and trade in 2022.
"In 2021, China continued its efforts to enhance its export controls and to fight against foreign sanctions. In 2022, China may release the implementing regulations for the Export Control Law and get used to enforcing its export control and sanctions laws and regulations, while the US may maintain its tightened export control and sanctions policies against China. Domestic and foreign invested companies in China are expected to devote more resources to build or improve their export controls and sanctions compliance program, while attaching greater importance to human rights (especially the so-called forced labor issue) and supply chain compliance in 2022, especially by those companies relying on the US and European markets. Though quite challenging, companies should avoid taking a side, and instead try to find a way to comply with requirements from both China and foreign countries (especially the US)."
Ren, Qing, Global Law Office, Beijing
Companies often face difficult compliance decisions as China and other countries and economic blocks each develop their own legislative responses to a changing world and business environment, but practitioners also expect China to continue to present attractive opportunities for foreign investment in certain sectors, as well as increasingly flexible rules to facilitate related deals.
"2022 will be another challenging year for foreign companies doing business in China. Regulatory headwinds are unlikely to abate, with companies needing to navigate Chinese export control, data privacy, data security, anti-trust and other regulations as well as US and other relevant jurisdictions' regulations, which in some cases will directly conflict with Chinese regulatory requirements. But the story of 2022 is unlikely to be only about challenges. China continues to push open doors for foreign investment in different sectors, with the new negative lists issued at the end of 2021 providing for (albeit modest) market openings, and continues to reform corporate and other business law rules to facilitate deal execution. Look for cross-border transactional activity that takes advantage of these opportunities and that in relevant cases may use joint venture or other structures that help mitigate regulatory concerns."
Paul McKenzie, Morrison & Foerster, Beijing and Shanghai

How will China's new and revised business legislation affect corporate governance?

Several major changes to the legal framework governing China-registered business entities took place in recent years, including the introduction of the Civil Code, which took effect in 2021, and the Foreign Investment Law, which entered into force in 2020. Practitioners also expect the Company Law to undergo a major revision in 2022, further impacting the way companies are structured, financed and governed, as well as the rights and interests of companies and their shareholders.
"In 2021, we witnessed restructurings, supply chain disruptions and force majeure issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic. We also experienced a number of existing Sino-foreign joint venture companies that, in the majority of cases, were requested by local company registration authorities to adapt to the new corporate governance structure provided under the Foreign Investment Law, which actually permits companies to amend their organizational form and internal governance provisions to comply with the Company Law until the end of 2024. We expect all of the aforementioned topics, as well as, in particular, data security and data protection compliance efforts, to remain of high importance in 2022. In addition, updates to important pieces of legislation, such as the Company Law, the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law and the Arbitration Law, are expected to have considerable impact on China-registered as well as China related businesses in 2022."
Michael Munzinger, CMS China, Shanghai
Rather than focusing exclusively on broadly phrased foreign investment laws, one lawyer believes businesses will be better served in 2022 by concentrating on the detailed policies and rules relevant to their specific interests.
"Every China market participant faced something new in 2021, the second year into the pandemic. For one, China continued to become more open to foreign investment, as evidenced by an ever-shorter version of the negative list issued at year's end. By contrast, however, regulatory controls were tightened in substantive areas of law such as data protection, anti-trust, and national security. To navigate these crosscurrents, a successful investment in China, big or small, now requires investors to know China, and the specific policy environment, better than ever. In this sense, now is not the time to ponder overarching laws that specifically apply to foreign investment, which will continue to fade away in terms of their importance. Rather, success will come to those foreign investors who pay more attention to detailed rules and regulations to properly re-position themselves, starting with the underlying behaviours and operations on which their China businesses are based."
Li, Jun, Han Kun Law Offices, Shanghai
Practitioners expect companies listed on mainland stock exchanges to face increased and better co-ordinated regulatory supervision, and companies listed or intending to list on overseas markets, including those using VIE structures, to enjoy a clearer and more practical regulatory process.
"According to the legislative plans of the government and securities regulatory authorities, 2022 may see the publication of new directives which will give regulators greater powers against misconduct or failures of governance by mainland Chinese-listed companies. Current proposals aim to create a broader range of central government-authorised regulatory powers on listed companies' behaviour, which may also cover environmental, social and governmental (ESG) issues. The latest draft rules relating to overseas listing directly or indirectly by Chinese companies also indicate a significant change to the IPO regime. On one hand, Chinese regulators are trying to place indirect overseas listings under their supervision, and on the other hand, they wish to simplify the regulatory process for direct overseas listings. Whilst the listing of a VIE structure is yet to be further clarified, it is expected that Chinese regulators will take a practical approach to deal with this."
John Xu, Linklaters, Shanghai

What major developments can investors and practitioners expect in the finance sector?

Lawyers in the finance sector provided insights on a wide range of issues. One predicts the adoption of an amended Anti-Money Laundering Law in 2022 to bring it more in line with international practice and expects to see developments in China's regulatory system for onshore and offshore capital markets.
"One expected milestone for 2022 is the likely amendment of the Anti-Money Laundering Law, following the release of a consultation draft in 2021. Financial regulators are expected to promulgate a series of implementing rules and guiding standards to align with international practices. This may include more stringent requirements on client due diligence, large-amount and suspicious transaction reporting, risk assessment and client record maintenance. PRC companies may be required to further improve internal control systems and risk management measures and respond to incremental compliance challenges. In another bright spot for 2022, we expect the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) to overhaul the regulatory system for overseas securities listings by domestic enterprises. CSRC also may enhance its cross-border regulatory co-operation and joint audit oversight with offshore regulators. For onshore capital markets, CSRC may further integrate and streamline its regulatory framework over PRC-listed companies, with key focuses set on statutory obligations of listed companies and investors' protection."
Yang, TieCheng, Han Kun Law Offices, Beijing
Another lawyer foresees an improved environment for public offerings, especially in Hong Kong's capital markets, due to an anticipated revamp of the rules on overseas listings and ongoing policy differences between the Chinese and US governments.
"We expect to see a comeback of IPOs and secondary listings of China concepts stocks in the Hong Kong capital markets in late 2022 due to the changing legal environment in China. Notably, the CSRC released a consultation paper to regulate Chinese companies' offshore listing in December 2021. If enacted in the current form, there will be a significant impact on Chinese VIE structured companies currently listed or planning to be listed overseas. However, we believe that Hong Kong will still be viewed more favourably than the US as a listing destination from a China regulatory perspective. In addition, with current market volatility and policy pressures from the Chinese and US governments, we expect to see more China concepts stocks coming back to the Hong Kong stock market for a secondary listing. These dual listed companies retain the flexibility to withdraw from the US market when the circumstances require or when the time is right."
Wang, Yang, Dechert, Beijing and Hong Kong
A third practitioner drew attention to the rollout of a pilot programme for China's digital currency, the e-CNY, which will be used to facilitate and track electronic payments.
"Back in October 2020, China's central bank (PBOC) circulated a draft amendment to the Law of the People's Bank of China, which officially introduced the digital currency, e-CNY. Unlike crypto currency, which has been outlawed in China, the e-CNY is a centralized digital currency primarily aimed at facilitating e-payments and enhancing the control and ease of tracking of e-payments. We anticipate the PBOC will expand the e-CNY pilot programme to more cities in 2022, but it remains unclear whether e-CNY will replace e-payment methods that are currently widely used through social media like WeChat Pay and Ali Pay. It is fair to say, however, that e-CNY is the only lawful digital currency in China, that it will be managed solely by the PBOC and that all e-payments must be transacted through a centralized and licensed platform to prevent money laundering and other regulatory issues in the financial industry."
Raymond Cai, Llinks Law Offices, Shanghai
Another lawyer predicts an expanding number of green financing projects in China and suggests that the Renminbi will be used in an ever-increasing number of cross-border financing transactions.
"We estimate that, in 2022, one feature of the Chinese finance sector is the increasing volume of green financing and climate-driven investment and financing projects, with an aim to contributing to the ultimate goal of carbon neutralisation. Another feature we expect to see is the increased use of RMB in cross-border (inbound and outbound) financing transactions, thanks to the continued promotion of RMB's international uses from both policy and business perspectives."
Zhang, Xin, Global Law Office, Beijing

What are the most significant human resources issues?

Practitioners believe the biggest issue in employment law in 2022 will involve compliance with China's new three-child policy, given differences amongst the various local implementing rules and the need for further clarity in national and local legislation. One lawyers also foresees a critical issue in the rising number of sex discrimination and harassment cases.
"In 2021, multiple provinces and cities in China implemented the new three-child policy by extending maternity leave and paternity leave and introducing childcare leave, a new type of employee leave. In 2022, we expect more issues will arise in the implementation of these new rules. The details of the new rules in each city or province differ, and the rules are silent as to how employers can verify that parents are properly sharing childcare leave and whether unused childcare leave may be carried over or encashed. Employers must address these issues and update internal policies in 2022. In addition, there were a number of high profile sex discrimination and harassment cases reported in 2021. This trend will likely continue into 2022 as companies are increasingly expected to face and manage reports about discrimination and harassment and pro-actively address workplace diversity and inclusion issues."
Johnny Choi, DLA Piper, Beijing
Another practitioner cited the challenges brought about by the three-child policy, as well as the need to address ongoing compliance issues brought about by the consent provisions in the PIPL, specifically the need to obtain employee consent to a company's personal information protection policies.
"By the end of 2021, many local governments issued updated employee leave policies due to the new, national three-child policy. All of these policies are very localized and most are very general. These issues will bring implementation problems, and we still need to determine to what extent the revised policies will be implemented in practice. In addition, another set of issues will be carried over from 2021, the need to resolve the HR challenges brought about by the PIPL and its provisions on consent. Companies must obtain the consent of employees to transfer their personal information abroad, provide employees (and candidates) with information on how they process personal information and obtain their general consent, as well as specific consent if, for example, sensitive personal information is involved. As a result, companies may need to review their personal information protection policies in 2022, update their employment rules and optimize their personal information processing procedures."
Jeanette Yu, CMS China, Shanghai

What is the focus of intellectual property practice in 2022?

In 2020 and 2021, the National People's Congress (NPC) amended China's intellectual property laws, administrative agencies issued related implementing rules and the Supreme People's Court released several judicial interpretations, all aimed at facilitating and protecting the development of intellectual property rights (IPR) in China. For 2022, one lawyer predicts that issues related to the utilisation of IPR, including IPR financing, will emerge as a key focus in intellectual property practice, especially given the government's goal to continue improving China's IPR competitiveness.
"China released its Guidelines for Building a Powerful Intellectual Property Country (2021-2035) in September 2021. The Guidelines set the goal for China to rank among the world's top tier by 2035 in IPR competitiveness. Development of IPR power has been one of China's most important policies for years, and we have seen the legislative activities for IPR protection in China increase in recent years. To effectively implement the amended trademark, copyright, patent and anti-unfair competition laws, numerous implementing rules and regulations, as well as judicial interpretations and opinions were issued in 2020 and 2021. In addition to judicial and administrative protection, China has been advocating the use of ADR to resolve intellectual property disputes. In 2022 and beyond, China will focus on not only stricter IPR protection but also more diverse and effective utilization of IPR, including the financing of IPR such as IPR mortgages, IPR securitization and so on."
Aggie Liu, Baker McKenzie FenXun, Beijing
Another practitioner foresees issues related to the ownership of data, as well as proprietary technologies that exploit datasets, arising as a significant area of interest in 2022.
"While data has been quite a buzz word in 2021, mostly for its implications to compliance issues and capital markets, we foresee some further heating up in 2022, this time from the perspective of data ownership rights in a digitalization era. This is hardly a new topic to many internet companies, where competition law is often leveraged to solve data scraping disputes. The next wave, however, may expand to more traditional sectors that are undergoing digitalization changes, thanks to the maturity of IoT and AI technologies. Issues related to the proper allocation of rights and interests pertaining to datasets, as well as the algorithms using these datasets will create both legal challenges and business opportunities."
Kevin Duan, Han Kun Law Offices, Beijing

What developments can we expect in the property sector?

In 2021, the State Council received authorisation to begin implementing a pilot property tax programme in select cities. Real estate practitioners believe the pilot programme will be one of the most significant developments in 2022. One lawyer suggests that the automatic renewal of residential land use rights presents another important issue.
"In October 2021, the Standing Committee of the NPC announced its decision to authorize the State Council to conduct a pilot real estate tax reform programme in certain areas. Looking ahead to 2022, we expect to see detailed regulations for the pilot programme, which is likely to involve, in addition to Shanghai and Chongqing, other wealthier and economically diversified cities such as Shenzhen, Hangzhou and Beijing. The tax rate is expected to start off low, ranging between 0.2% and 1%, to avoid strong protest from the taxpayers. Considering the disparities among different areas of the PRC and the government's constant emphasis on stability, it might still take time for the tax to be rolled out on a nationwide scale. We also expect to see clarification on whether additional expenses will be required to automatically renew the tenure of residential land, since the Civil Code is ambiguous on this issue and leaves it to future legislation."
Stephen Lin, Fangda Partners, Shanghai
Another practitioner agrees that the pilot programme will emerge as a key issue and predicts that new finance and tax rules will be issued to implement the programme.
"The authorization in October 2021 to carry out a pilot programme of real estate tax reforms in certain regions is a notable event in respect of real estate tax law development in China. After years of discussion and planning, the Chinese government is determined to accelerate the implementation of real estate tax nationwide, although the reform will be limited to certain regions in the near future. It is widely anticipated that certain tier one and tier two cities in the Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta, and Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Rim might be included in the first pilot regions. It could be predicted that a series of supporting measures in the finance and taxation sectors will be introduced to facilitate this pilot programme, leading to long-term and far-reaching impacts on the business landscape of the real estate market in this country."
Nancy Zhang, JunHe, Beijing

How will China's life sciences sector continue to evolve?

In 2021, the National Medical Products Administration, China National Intellectual Property Administration and Supreme People's Court each issued rules to establish an early settlement mechanism, known as the patent linkage system, for drug patent disputes. Practitioners expect to see how the patent linkage system operates in practice in 2022 and whether the roll out of the system presents new opportunities and challenges.
"With the Implementation Measures for the Early Resolution Mechanism for Drug Patent Disputes (for Trial Implementation) and the corresponding judicial interpretation and administrative adjudication measures coming into force in 2021, the institutional framework of China's patent linkage system is basically in place. In 2022, lawsuits and administrative adjudication cases accepted under this system are expected to yield results, and we will have the opportunity to learn more about the operation of China's patent linkage system in practice. In addition, the revised Patent Examination Guidelines with the added special provisions for patent invalidation procedures as applied to the patent linkage system will also become effective in the near future, further improving the patent linkage system. With the above factors coming into play, pharmaceutical companies will be faced with more opportunities as well as challenges in China in the coming year, as more disputes under the patent linkage system will likely emerge."
Ran, Ruixue, Covington & Burling, Beijing
In addition, the NPC amended the Drug Administration Law (DAL) in late 2019, in part to establish a drug marketing authorisation holder (MAH) system, and the State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) partially revised the related implementing rules in 2020. In 2021, the State Council implemented a pilot MAH programme for medical devices. One lawyer predicts that additional revised implementing rules for the DAL will be issued in 2022.
"In 2022, companies will continue to face challenges in the supply chain, mobility affecting recruitment of talent around the world and increasing geo-political tensions. In terms of legal developments in the life sciences sector, we expect that the revised implementation rules for the new DAL will be released as SAMR had said in its 2020 legislative plan that it will push this forward and speed up the formulation and revision of supporting regulations for the DAL. Also, multinational companies in the life sciences industry will need to adapt their management and use of patient data to be in line with the requirements under the new PIPL, most notably the conditions that the PIPL imposes on cross-border transfers of personal information."
Philip Cheng, Hogan Lovells, Shanghai

How will the amended Arbitration Law impact dispute resolution in China?

There were several interesting developments in dispute resolution in 2021, including new rules governing online litigation and efforts to standardise the uniform practice of law. Practitioners view a pending amendment to the Arbitration Law as the most significant potential development in 2022 and expect the revised law to usher in a new era of arbitration practice in China.
"The past year witnessed the release by the Ministry of Justice of a draft amendment to the Arbitration Law and the recognition by the international arbitration community that Chinese cities (Hong Kong, Beijing and Shanghai) and institutions (HKIAC and CIETAC) have become the most preferred seats and institutions internationally. 2022 may see the promulgation of the long-awaited revised Arbitration Law, which will be in line with international practices and bring about ground-breaking changes to arbitration practice in China in the years to come. I have no doubt foreign arbitral institutions will take full advantage of the new law to set up and boost the administration services of China-seated arbitrations and Chinese institutions internationalise their operations."
Ye, Weina, Herbert Smith Freehills Kewei Joint Operation Office, Shanghai
Policy documents issued in 2019 and 2020 anticipated the ability of foreign arbitral institutions seated in Mainland China to provide arbitration services in relation to disputes involving foreign investment and international commerce. One lawyer expects the amended Arbitration Law to address this issue but predicts that Hong Kong will remain as the preferred seat for resolving international disputes in the interim.
"Disruptions to supply chain and travel restrictions around the world during the COVID-19 era will continue to drive a surge in disputes in 2022. Arbitration will remain as the preferred mode of dispute resolution as proceedings are generally less impacted by local lockdowns and restrictions and virtual hearings have become the norm. The growth of arbitration in Mainland China for resolving foreign-related disputes is expected to be particularly significant, as China seeks to modernize its arbitration regime by enacting an amended Arbitration Law, proposing substantial changes such as allowing ad hoc arbitrations and opening the door for foreign arbitration institutions to administer foreign-related arbitrations in Mainland China. Despite the turmoil in recent years, Hong Kong will remain a key player in international arbitration as one of the most established arbitration hubs supported by a pro-arbitration judiciary and the only seat outside of Mainland China where parties to arbitrations may obtain interim relief from the people's courts."
Kevin Hong, Norton Rose Fulbright, Hong Kong