A roundup of recent developments in consumer finance during October 2021.
The following is a roundup of recent developments in consumer finance during October 2021:
North Carolina Joins States with Regulatory Sandboxes. On October 15, 2021, the Governor of North Carolina signed into law the North Carolina Regulatory Sandbox Act of 2021. By doing so, North Carolina joins other states that have enacted regulatory sandbox acts. Depending on the scope of a particular state's regulatory sandbox act, a regulatory sandbox:
permits a company (innovator) to temporarily test an innovative financial or insurance product or service and make it available to consumers on a limited basis without being subject to licensing or other regulatory obligations under the state's laws;
may require the innovator to have a presence in the state; and
permits the innovative product or service to be made available to consumers for a specified period before the innovator must either stop operating or obtain the necessary license.
Reaction to Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' Hunstein Decision. On April 21, 2021, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, in Richard Hunstein v. Preferred Collection and Management Services, Inc., held that a debt collector's disclosure of information about a consumer and his debt to a mail vendor (mail vendor disclosure) was:
a harm to the consumer sufficient to confer standing for the consumer to sue in a US federal court (federal court standing); and
Other federal courts, most recently the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, in Paul Quaglia v. NS193, LLC, SN Servicing Corporation, and McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, No. 21 C 3252 (N.D. Ill., Oct. 12, 2021), disagreed with the Eleventh Circuit on whether a mail vendor disclosure is a harm to the consumer sufficient to confer federal court standing. The Illinois district court did not rule on whether a mail vendor disclosure violates the FDCPA.
Push to Regulate Earned Wage Access Products. On October 12, 2021, numerous consumer protection organizations and academics submitted letters (here and here) to Rohit Chopra, the new Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), concerning earned wage access (EWA) products. The letters criticize prior CFPB determinations that EWA products were not "credit" under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) (15 U.S.C. §§ 1601 to 1667f). The letters urge the CFPB to:
treat fee-based EWA products as credit covered by TILA, and regulate providers under the CFPB's authority over payday loans;
Probe of Big Tech Payment Platforms. On October 21, 2021, the CFPB ordered Google, Apple, Facebook, Amazon, Square, and Paypal to turn over information and data on their payment system business practices under Section 1022(c)(4) of the Dodd-Frank Act. The order seeks information on topics including data harvesting and monetization, access restrictions and user choice, and the companies' compliance consumer protections under the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (EFTA) (15 U.S.C. §§ 1693 to 1693f) and Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) (15 U.S.C. §§ 6801 to 6809). A statement by CFPB Director Chopra indicated that the CFPB's effort is one of many related efforts within the Federal Reserve System and will help inform regulators and policymakers about the future of the payments system.
express concern over a failure to highlight the significant risks associated with high-cost lending through rent-a-bank schemes, whereby a bank rents out its charter to a financial company that is not a bank "to enable attempted avoidance of state consumer protection laws, in particular interest rate and fee caps, or state oversight through licensing regimes"; and
urge the regulators to reaffirm their historical positions and explicitly disavow rent-a-bank schemes.