A&O decision insight: Upper Tribunal upholds FCA’s decision to ban financial adviser for non-financial misconduct | Practical Law

A&O decision insight: Upper Tribunal upholds FCA’s decision to ban financial adviser for non-financial misconduct | Practical Law

In this practitioner insight decision report, Sarah Hitchins, a partner, and David McMenamin, an associate, in Allen & Overy's Litigation and Investigations Group, consider the decision of the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) in Jon Frensham v FCA [2021] UKUT 0222 (TCC) (UT/2020/000210) (31 August 2021).

A&O decision insight: Upper Tribunal upholds FCA’s decision to ban financial adviser for non-financial misconduct

Law stated as at 20 Sep 2022United Kingdom
In this practitioner insight decision report, Sarah Hitchins, a partner, and David McMenamin, an associate, in Allen & Overy's Litigation and Investigations Group, consider the decision of the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) in Jon Frensham v FCA [2021] UKUT 0222 (TCC) (UT/2020/000210) (31 August 2021).
The tribunal decided to dismiss a reference by a financial adviser of an FCA decision notice under which the FCA decided to withdraw his approval and issue a prohibition order as a result of non-financial misconduct on his part.
For the full range of financial services case and regulatory decision reports with practitioner insight from Allen & Overy LLP, see Practice note, Allen & Overy financial services case and regulatory decision reports.