Employee not under implied duty to disclose allegations of misconduct in absence of express term (EAT) | Practical Law

Employee not under implied duty to disclose allegations of misconduct in absence of express term (EAT) | Practical Law

In The Basildon Academies v Amadi UKEAT/0343/14, the EAT considered whether an employee was under an implied duty to disclose allegations of misconduct to his employer where there was no express contractual obligation.

Employee not under implied duty to disclose allegations of misconduct in absence of express term (EAT)

by Practical Law Employment
Published on 10 Jun 2015 • England, Scotland, Wales
In The Basildon Academies v Amadi UKEAT/0343/14, the EAT considered whether an employee was under an implied duty to disclose allegations of misconduct to his employer where there was no express contractual obligation.