The denial of a motion for summary judgment based upon qualified immunity is a collateral order capable of immediate review.
Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985). Our review is “significantly limited,” though, extending to questions of law only.
Kinney v. Weaver, 367 F.3d 337, 346 (5th Cir.2004) (en banc). We have authority to review a district court's determination that “a certain course of conduct would, as a matter of law, be objectively unreasonable in light of clearly established law.”
Id. We may not review, however, a determination that there are genuine issues of material fact about whether defendants engaged in that course of conduct.
Id. When reviewing the purely legal questions about the claimed course of conduct, we “accept the plaintiffs' version of the facts as true.”
Id. at 348. There is no basis on which to reverse the finding of a material factual dispute.