PUNITIVE DAMAGES COULD BE ADDED TO $1.1 MILLION BAD-FAITH JUDGMENT Valente v. UnumProvident Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

PUNITIVE DAMAGES COULD BE ADDED TO $1.1 MILLION BAD-FAITH JUDGMENT Valente v. UnumProvident Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, PUNITIVE DAMAGES COULD BE ADDED TO $1.1 MILLION BAD-FAITH JUDGMENT Valente v. UnumProvident Corp., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

PUNITIVE DAMAGES COULD BE ADDED TO $1.1 MILLION BAD-FAITH JUDGMENT Valente v. UnumProvident Corp.

2 No. 12 ANIBFLR 2Andrews Insurance Bad Faith Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

PUNITIVE DAMAGES COULD BE ADDED TO $1.1 MILLION BAD-FAITH JUDGMENT Valente v. UnumProvident Corp.

2 No. 12 ANIBFLR 2Andrews Insurance Bad Faith Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

2 No. 12 Andrews Insurance Bad Faith Litig. Rep. 2
Andrews Insurance Bad Faith Litigation Reporter
*1 October 10, 2006
Disability
Copyright © 2006 Thomson/West .

PUNITIVE DAMAGES COULD BE ADDED TO $1.1 MILLION BAD-FAITH JUDGMENT

Valente v. UnumProvident Corp.

A California appellate court has determined that punitive damages could be tacked onto a $1.1 million judgment on a disability claim as a result of erroneous and prejudicial jury instructions related to an insurer's bad-faith conduct.
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.