U. S. Flag Foundation, Inc. v. Radich | Cases | Westlaw

U. S. Flag Foundation, Inc. v. Radich | Cases | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, U. S. Flag Foundation, Inc. v. Radich, Cases
Skip Page Header

U. S. Flag Foundation, Inc. v. Radich

Supreme Court, New York County, New York, Special Term, Part I.April 11, 196753 Misc.2d 597279 N.Y.S.2d 233 (Approx. 4 pages)

U. S. Flag Foundation, Inc. v. Radich

Supreme Court, New York County, New York, Special Term, Part I.April 11, 196753 Misc.2d 597279 N.Y.S.2d 233 (Approx. 4 pages)

53 Misc.2d 597
Supreme Court, New York County, New York,
Special Term, Part I.
UNITED STATES FLAG FOUNDATION, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
Stephen RADICH, d/b/a Stephen Radich Gallery, Defendant.
April 11, 1967.

Attorneys and Law Firms

**234 *598 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, New York City (Peter M. Brown, Terence F. Gilheany, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.
Richard G. Green, New York City (Shirley Fingerhood, New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

Opinion

IRVING L. LEVEY, Justice.
Defendant moves to dismiss pursuant to Rule 3211(a) 3 and Rule 3211(a) 7 of the CPLR on the grounds that the plaintiff does not have the legal capacity to sue and the complaint fails to state a cause of action.
The plaintiff, a non-profit tax-exempt organization formed to promote the display of and respect for the United States flag, sues the defendant, the operator of an art gallery to recover damages under section 1425, subdivision 16, of the New York Penal Law.
In substance, it is alleged that since December 13, 1966 the defendant has exhibited 13 three-dimensional objects, called ‘constructions', which are made partly of the United States flag or portions thereof and partly of other objects including a gas mask, Russian flags, a Nazi swastika and a Viet Cong flag.
Two of the ‘constructions' on display, are the subject matter of the suit for damages. One, six feet high, consists of a stuffed United States flag shaped in the form of a dead human body being hanged by the neck. The other, about seven feet high, is in the form of a cross made by stuffed church flags, with the United States flag rolled and utilized to depict an erect human penis with pubic hair on the vertical bar of the cross.
There is no doubt that the facts alleged constitute a cause of action pursuant to the provisions of section 1425(16) of the Penal Code.
Defendant has completely failed to establish to this court's satisfaction that the aforementioned section is unconstitutional in that (1) it denies freedom of speech, (2) is vague, (3) violates the equal protection clause, or (4) places the defendant in double jeopardy.
Suffice it to say that the statute deals with the flag itself, a symbol of our feee and independent country. The statute in no way curtails **235 political dissent or prohibits communication of ideas. The descration of our flag cannot be utilized as a symbolic *599 act to publish or exhibit disagreement with or opposition to the policies of our government.
To permit such desecration under the guise of freedom of speech would certainly weaken, if not destroy, one of our most cherished symbols.
The motion is in all respects denied.

All Citations

53 Misc.2d 597, 279 N.Y.S.2d 233
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.