In
City of Rocky Ford, we determined that “neither this, nor any other court, may be called upon to construe or pass upon a legislative act until it has been adopted. The
only exception to this rule is the constitutional provision authorizing the legislature to propound interrogatories to the supreme court upon important questions upon solemn occasions.”
133 Colo. at 265, 293 P.2d at 976 (emphasis added). Although we held in
City of Rocky Ford that the only constitutional provision which constituted a sufficient exception or extraordinary circumstance was interrogatories propounded pursuant to
Article VI, section 3, that case was decided before
Article XIX was enacted. At that time, the single-subject requirement was beyond the contemplation of the court. In my view, like the extraordinary circumstance or exception that existed by virtue of
Article VI, section 3, the single-subject requirement of
Article XIX, section 2(3), by its unambiguous terms, is a constitutional provision that creates a circumstance sufficiently extraordinary to establish jurisdiction in this court.