In
Renton, the Supreme Court held that a content-neutral zoning ordinance is “properly analyzed as a form of time, place, and manner regulation.”
Id. at 46, 106 S.Ct. at 928. Thus, like all content-neutral time, place, and manner regulations, zoning ordinances “are acceptable so long as they are designed to serve a substantial governmental interest and do not unreasonably limit alternative avenues of communication.”
Id. at 47, 106 S.Ct. at 928. The County's ordinance is content-neutral because, as previously noted, it focuses on the secondary effects of adult entertainment establishments.
Cf. id. at 47–48, 106 S.Ct. at 929. We have determined the County's interests in passing the ordinance were substantial. We further conclude the zoning provision does not unreasonably limit alternative avenues of communication. The ordinance solely prohibits Appellant from obtaining an adult entertainment establishment license for an establishment within the Central Business District. Appellant may operate an adult entertainment establishment in other locations outside the Central Business District, subject to other applicable zoning restrictions. The zoning provision of the ordinance thus satisfies the requirements of the First Amendment.