§ 40.30 Previous prosecution; what constitutes | Statutes | Westlaw

§ 40.30 Previous prosecution; what constitutes | Statutes | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, § 40.30 Previous prosecution; what constitutes, Statutes
Skip Page Header

§ 40.30 Previous prosecution; what constitutes

NY CRIM PRO § 40.30McKinney's Consolidated Laws of New York AnnotatedCriminal Procedure Law (Approx. 2 pages)

§ 40.30 Previous prosecution; what constitutes

NY CRIM PRO § 40.30McKinney's Consolidated Laws of New York AnnotatedCriminal Procedure Law (Approx. 2 pages)

McKinney's Consolidated Laws of New York Annotated
Criminal Procedure Law (Refs & Annos)
Chapter 11-a. Of the Consolidated Laws (Refs & Annos)
Part One. General Provisions
Title C. General Principles Relating to Requirements for and Exemptions from Criminal Prosecution
Article 40. Exemption from Prosecution by Reason of Previous Prosecution (Refs & Annos)
McKinney's CPL § 40.30
§ 40.30 Previous prosecution; what constitutes
1. Except as otherwise provided in this section, a person “is prosecuted” for an offense, within the meaning of section 40.20, when he is charged therewith by an accusatory instrument filed in a court of this state or of any jurisdiction within the United States, and when the action either:
(a) Terminates in a conviction upon a plea of guilty; or
(b) Proceeds to the trial stage and a jury has been impaneled and sworn or, in the case of a trial by the court without a jury, a witness is sworn.
2. Despite the occurrence of proceedings specified in subdivision one, a person is not deemed to have been prosecuted for an offense, within the meaning of section 40.20, when:
(a) Such prosecution occurred in a court which lacked jurisdiction over the defendant or the offense; or
(b) Such prosecution was for a lesser offense than could have been charged under the facts of the case, and the prosecution was procured by the defendant, without the knowledge of the appropriate prosecutor, for the purpose of avoiding prosecution for a greater offense.
3. Despite the occurrence of proceedings specified in subdivision one, if such proceedings are subsequently nullified by a court order which restores the action to its pre-pleading status or which directs a new trial of the same accusatory instrument, the nullified proceedings do not bar further prosecution of such offense under the same accusatory instrument.
4. Despite the occurrence of proceedings specified in subdivision one, if such proceedings are subsequently nullified by a court order which dismisses the accusatory instrument but authorizes the people to obtain a new accusatory instrument charging the same offense or an offense based upon the same conduct, the nullified proceedings do not bar further prosecution of such offense under any new accusatory instrument obtained pursuant to such court order or authorization.

Credits

(L.1970, c. 996. Amended L.1974, c. 80.)
McKinney's CPL § 40.30, NY CRIM PRO § 40.30
Current through L.2024, chapters 1 to 59, 61 to 121. Some statute sections may be more current, see credits for details.
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.