EX-COO FALLS FAR SHORT OF PROVING HE WAS PROMISED STOCK Jacobson v. Dryson Acceptance Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

EX-COO FALLS FAR SHORT OF PROVING HE WAS PROMISED STOCK Jacobson v. Dryson Acceptance Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, EX-COO FALLS FAR SHORT OF PROVING HE WAS PROMISED STOCK Jacobson v. Dryson Acceptance Corp., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

EX-COO FALLS FAR SHORT OF PROVING HE WAS PROMISED STOCK Jacobson v. Dryson Acceptance Corp.

17 No. 10 ANDECLR 7Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

EX-COO FALLS FAR SHORT OF PROVING HE WAS PROMISED STOCK Jacobson v. Dryson Acceptance Corp.

17 No. 10 ANDECLR 7Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

17 No. 10 Andrews Del. Corp. Litig. Rep. 7
Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter
December 9, 2002
Burden of Proof:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

EX-COO FALLS FAR SHORT OF PROVING HE WAS PROMISED STOCK

Jacobson v. Dryson Acceptance Corp.

When an ex-officer of a closely held corporation got his day in court to prove that his partner reneged on a promise to give him 20 percent of the business, he not only failed to document that promise, he didn't even testify that it was ever made, a...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.