BANK DID NOT HAVE DUTY TO INFORM OF KITING SCHEME Frost Nat'l Bank v. Midwest Autohaus | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

BANK DID NOT HAVE DUTY TO INFORM OF KITING SCHEME Frost Nat'l Bank v. Midwest Autohaus | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, BANK DID NOT HAVE DUTY TO INFORM OF KITING SCHEME Frost Nat'l Bank v. Midwest Autohaus, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

BANK DID NOT HAVE DUTY TO INFORM OF KITING SCHEME Frost Nat'l Bank v. Midwest Autohaus

6 No. 17 ANBLLLR 11Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

BANK DID NOT HAVE DUTY TO INFORM OF KITING SCHEME Frost Nat'l Bank v. Midwest Autohaus

6 No. 17 ANBLLLR 11Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

6 No. 17 Andrews' Bank & Lender Liab. Litig. Rep. 11
Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter
April 19, 2001
Uniform Commercial Code
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

BANK DID NOT HAVE DUTY TO INFORM OF KITING SCHEME

Frost Nat'l Bank v. Midwest Autohaus

A bank that discovered a check-kiting scheme did not have a duty under the Illinois Uniform Commercial Code to inform a competing institution of the fraud, the Seventh Circuit has ruled. The court based its holding on the fact that the banks did not...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.