UNLAWFUL TYING ARRANGEMENT REQUIRES SUFFICIENT MARKET POWER, AR SUP. CT. SAYS Interstate Oil and Supply Co. v. Troutman Oil Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

UNLAWFUL TYING ARRANGEMENT REQUIRES SUFFICIENT MARKET POWER, AR SUP. CT. SAYS Interstate Oil and Supply Co. v. Troutman Oil Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, UNLAWFUL TYING ARRANGEMENT REQUIRES SUFFICIENT MARKET POWER, AR SUP. CT. SAYS Interstate Oil and Supply Co. v. Troutman Oil Co., Secondary Sources
6 No. 3 Andrews Antitrust Litig. Rep. 14
Andrews Antitrust Litigation Reporter
September 1998
Market Power
Copyright (c) 1998 Andrews Publications

UNLAWFUL TYING ARRANGEMENT REQUIRES SUFFICIENT MARKET POWER, AR SUP. CT. SAYS

Interstate Oil and Supply Co. v. Troutman Oil Co.

Conditioning the sale of a fuel distributorship on the seller's agreement that his gas station lessees will purchase fuel from the buyer does not constitute an unlawful tying arrangement, absent a show of sufficient market power in the tying product...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.