STATE'S CLAIM FOR COST RECOVERY UNTIMELY, MICH. APP. CT. SAYS Michigan Atty. Gen. v. Woodland Oil Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

STATE'S CLAIM FOR COST RECOVERY UNTIMELY, MICH. APP. CT. SAYS Michigan Atty. Gen. v. Woodland Oil Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, STATE'S CLAIM FOR COST RECOVERY UNTIMELY, MICH. APP. CT. SAYS Michigan Atty. Gen. v. Woodland Oil Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

STATE'S CLAIM FOR COST RECOVERY UNTIMELY, MICH. APP. CT. SAYS Michigan Atty. Gen. v. Woodland Oil Co.

21 No. 22 ANHWLR 10Andrews Hazardous Waste Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

STATE'S CLAIM FOR COST RECOVERY UNTIMELY, MICH. APP. CT. SAYS Michigan Atty. Gen. v. Woodland Oil Co.

21 No. 22 ANHWLR 10Andrews Hazardous Waste Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

21 No. 22 Andrews Hazardous Waste Litig. Rep. 10
Andrews Hazardous Waste Litigation Reporter
September 14, 2001
Petroleum
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

STATE'S CLAIM FOR COST RECOVERY UNTIMELY, MICH. APP. CT. SAYS

Michigan Atty. Gen. v. Woodland Oil Co.

A Michigan appeals court, for the second time, has affirmed a ruling that state petroleum contamination claims were untimely. The state attorney general and Department of Environmental Quality said they were entitled to recover “response activity”...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.