EVEN INDIANA BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE CAN'T PROTECT STRONG-ARM TACTICS, SAYS STATE SUP. CT. G&N Aircraft v. Boehm | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

EVEN INDIANA BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE CAN'T PROTECT STRONG-ARM TACTICS, SAYS STATE SUP. CT. G&N Aircraft v. Boehm | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, EVEN INDIANA BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE CAN'T PROTECT STRONG-ARM TACTICS, SAYS STATE SUP. CT. G&N Aircraft v. Boehm, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

EVEN INDIANA BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE CAN'T PROTECT STRONG-ARM TACTICS, SAYS STATE SUP. CT. G&N Aircraft v. Boehm

15 No. 12 ANDECLR 9Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

EVEN INDIANA BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE CAN'T PROTECT STRONG-ARM TACTICS, SAYS STATE SUP. CT. G&N Aircraft v. Boehm

15 No. 12 ANDECLR 9Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

15 No. 12 Andrews Del. Corp. Litig. Rep. 9
Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter
April 2, 2001
Business Judgment Rule
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

EVEN INDIANA BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE CAN'T PROTECT STRONG-ARM TACTICS, SAYS STATE SUP. CT.

G&N Aircraft v. Boehm

Even Indiana's comparatively pro-management version of the business judgment rule cannot protect a president/majority shareholder from a judgment for his attempt to force his vice president/minority shareholder to sell his stock for less than half of...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.