CA SUP. CT. BRIEFED ON WHETHER BELOW-COST CELL PHONE SALES ARE LEGAL Cel-Tech Communications v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

CA SUP. CT. BRIEFED ON WHETHER BELOW-COST CELL PHONE SALES ARE LEGAL Cel-Tech Communications v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, CA SUP. CT. BRIEFED ON WHETHER BELOW-COST CELL PHONE SALES ARE LEGAL Cel-Tech Communications v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co., Secondary Sources
1998-JUN Andrews Antitrust Litig. Rep. 8
Andrews Antitrust Litigation Reporter
June, 1998
Predatory Pricing
Copyright (c) 1998 Andrews Publications

CA SUP. CT. BRIEFED ON WHETHER BELOW-COST CELL PHONE SALES ARE LEGAL

Cel-Tech Communications v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.

A cellular service provider's below-cost sales of cellular phones cannot violate California's Unfair Competition Act because such conduct is specifically allowed under another statute, the Unfair Practices Act, which takes precedence, defendant Los...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.