9TH CIRCUIT: CONTRIBUTION CLAIMS NOT ‘REVIVED’ BY BANKRUPTCY SETTLEMENT Asarco LLC v. Celanese Chem. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

9TH CIRCUIT: CONTRIBUTION CLAIMS NOT ‘REVIVED’ BY BANKRUPTCY SETTLEMENT Asarco LLC v. Celanese Chem. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, 9TH CIRCUIT: CONTRIBUTION CLAIMS NOT ‘REVIVED’ BY BANKRUPTCY SETTLEMENT Asarco LLC v. Celanese Chem. Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

9TH CIRCUIT: CONTRIBUTION CLAIMS NOT ‘REVIVED’ BY BANKRUPTCY SETTLEMENT Asarco LLC v. Celanese Chem. Co.

33 No. 13 WJTOX 11By Alex Horowitz, Senior Content Writer, Westlaw Daily BriefingWestlaw Journal Toxic Torts (Approx. 3 pages)

9TH CIRCUIT: CONTRIBUTION CLAIMS NOT ‘REVIVED’ BY BANKRUPTCY SETTLEMENT Asarco LLC v. Celanese Chem. Co.

33 No. 13 WJTOX 11By Alex Horowitz, Senior Content Writer, Westlaw Daily BriefingWestlaw Journal Toxic Torts (Approx. 3 pages)

33 No. 13 Westlaw Journal Toxic Torts 11
Westlaw Journal Toxic Torts
*1 August 21, 2015
Cleanup Costs
By Alex Horowitz, Senior Content Writer, Westlaw Daily Briefing
Copyright © 2015 Thomson Reuters .

9TH CIRCUIT: CONTRIBUTION CLAIMS NOT ‘REVIVED’ BY BANKRUPTCY SETTLEMENT

Asarco LLC v. Celanese Chem. Co.

A federal appeals panel has rejected as time-barred Asarco LLC's post-bankruptcy suit seeking contribution for $33 million in cleanup costs more than 20 years after a judicially approved settlement of a cost-recovery suit over a California Superfund...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.