CALIF. COURT SAYS WELDER'S NEGLIGENCE SUIT IS NOT TIME-BARRED Mandujano v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

CALIF. COURT SAYS WELDER'S NEGLIGENCE SUIT IS NOT TIME-BARRED Mandujano v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, CALIF. COURT SAYS WELDER'S NEGLIGENCE SUIT IS NOT TIME-BARRED Mandujano v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

CALIF. COURT SAYS WELDER'S NEGLIGENCE SUIT IS NOT TIME-BARRED Mandujano v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.

17 No. 17 ANTILR 10Andrews Tobacco Industry Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

CALIF. COURT SAYS WELDER'S NEGLIGENCE SUIT IS NOT TIME-BARRED Mandujano v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.

17 No. 17 ANTILR 10Andrews Tobacco Industry Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

17 No. 17 Andrews Tobacco Indus. Litig. Rep. 10
Andrews Tobacco Industry Litigation Reporter
May 31, 2002
Statute of Limitations (Silica Exposure):
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

CALIF. COURT SAYS WELDER'S NEGLIGENCE SUIT IS NOT TIME-BARRED

Mandujano v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co.

A California appeals court has ruled that a welder who claimed he developed respiratory problems after being exposed to silica dust at work can proceed with his suit against 3M and nine other defendants. Mandujano et al. v. Minnesota Mining &...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.