ON SECOND THOUGHT, INACTIVE SUIT NEED NOT BE DISMISSED, SAYS JUDGE Lane v. Cancer Treatment Ctrs. of Am. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

ON SECOND THOUGHT, INACTIVE SUIT NEED NOT BE DISMISSED, SAYS JUDGE Lane v. Cancer Treatment Ctrs. of Am. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, ON SECOND THOUGHT, INACTIVE SUIT NEED NOT BE DISMISSED, SAYS JUDGE Lane v. Cancer Treatment Ctrs. of Am., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

ON SECOND THOUGHT, INACTIVE SUIT NEED NOT BE DISMISSED, SAYS JUDGE Lane v. Cancer Treatment Ctrs. of Am.

15 No. 12 ANCODLLR 9Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

ON SECOND THOUGHT, INACTIVE SUIT NEED NOT BE DISMISSED, SAYS JUDGE Lane v. Cancer Treatment Ctrs. of Am.

15 No. 12 ANCODLLR 9Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

15 No. 12 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 9
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
April 17, 2000
Failure to Prosecute
Copyright (c) 2000 Andrews Publications

ON SECOND THOUGHT, INACTIVE SUIT NEED NOT BE DISMISSED, SAYS JUDGE

Lane v. Cancer Treatment Ctrs. of Am.

A Delaware state court judge decided that after a closer look at the record, a long-idle suit against Cancer Treatment Centers of America does not deserve to be dismissed for inactivity - but only by the skin of its teeth. Lane v. Cancer Treatment...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.