JUDGE BARS QUESTIONS ABOUT INSURER'S CONDUCT AFTER ARBITRATION Kakule v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

JUDGE BARS QUESTIONS ABOUT INSURER'S CONDUCT AFTER ARBITRATION Kakule v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, JUDGE BARS QUESTIONS ABOUT INSURER'S CONDUCT AFTER ARBITRATION Kakule v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

JUDGE BARS QUESTIONS ABOUT INSURER'S CONDUCT AFTER ARBITRATION Kakule v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

18 No. 36 ANINSCLR 7Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

JUDGE BARS QUESTIONS ABOUT INSURER'S CONDUCT AFTER ARBITRATION Kakule v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

18 No. 36 ANINSCLR 7Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

18 No. 36 Andrews Ins. Coverage Litig. Rep. 7
Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter
*1 June 13, 2008
Discovery
Copyright © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West .

JUDGE BARS QUESTIONS ABOUT INSURER'S CONDUCT AFTER ARBITRATION

Kakule v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co.

A federal judge in Pennsylvania has precluded an insured from inquiring into the post-arbitration conduct of his insurance carrier, saying it would be “harassing and burdensome.”
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.