SEC Charges Company with Making False Statements in Sustainability Reports and Public Filings | Practical Law

SEC Charges Company with Making False Statements in Sustainability Reports and Public Filings | Practical Law

The SEC announced it charged Vale S.A., a Brazilian mining company, with making false and misleading statements about the safety of its dams in the years leading up to the 2019 collapse of its Brumadinho dam. The SEC alleges that Vale misled investors about the safety of its dams by making false and misleading statements through its ESG disclosures in public filings, sustainability reports, and other public statements.

SEC Charges Company with Making False Statements in Sustainability Reports and Public Filings

by Practical Law Corporate & Securities
Published on 03 May 2022USA (National/Federal)
The SEC announced it charged Vale S.A., a Brazilian mining company, with making false and misleading statements about the safety of its dams in the years leading up to the 2019 collapse of its Brumadinho dam. The SEC alleges that Vale misled investors about the safety of its dams by making false and misleading statements through its ESG disclosures in public filings, sustainability reports, and other public statements.
Update: On March 28, 2023, the SEC announced that Vale S.A. agreed to pay $55.9 million to settle the charges brought for making allegedly false and misleading statements about the safety of its dams. In the press release, Mark Cave, Associate Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, stated that the SEC's action against Vale "illustrates the interplay between the company's sustainability reports and its obligations under the federal securities laws" and that the fine demonstrates that "public companies can and should be held accountable for material misrepresentations in their ESG-related disclosures."
On April 28, 2022, the SEC announced it charged Vale S.A., a Brazilian mining company, with making false and misleading statements about the safety of its dams in the years leading up to the 2019 collapse of its Brumadinho dam. The SEC alleges that Vale misled investors about the safety of its dams by making false and misleading statements through its ESG disclosures in public filings, sustainability reports, and other public statements.

Background

Vale is a Brazilian mining company and one of the world's largest iron ore producers. In January 2019, Vale's Brumadinho dam suffered a catastrophic failure, releasing almost 12 million tons of mining waste onto the mine's offices and a local community before reaching the Paraopeba River, nearly five miles from the dam. The collapse killed 270 people and caused significant environmental damage. The Brumadinho dam collapse also occurred just over three years after the failure of another of Vale's dams near Mariana, Brazil, which resulted in one of the worst environmental disasters in Brazil's history. It was determined that the collapse of both dams was caused by a geophysical phenomenon known as liquefaction.
Vale's American Depositary Shares (ADSs) and several series of its notes have been registered with the SEC under the Exchange Act and trade on the NYSE. In particular, Vale issued $1 billion of 6.25% notes due 2026 in February 2017 and more than 170 million ADSs in August 2017, at a time where Vale was making false statements about the conditions of the Brumadinho dam and the company's commitment to safety. Following the collapse of the Brumadinho dam, the price of Vale's ADSs plummeted nearly 25% and the company lost almost $4.4 billion in market capitalization. Vale's corporate credit rating was also downgraded to junk status and the board of directors suspended all dividend payments.

SEC Complaint

According to the SEC's complaint, in the years following the Mariana dam disaster and leading up to the Brumadinho dam collapse, Vale was aware of critical safety issues with the Brumadinho dam, including a high risk of failure due to liquefaction. Specific allegations include that Vale:
  • Knew or was reckless in not knowing that the Brumadinho dam did not meet international minimum standards for safety.
  • Deceptively and repeatedly manipulated the audit process to obtain false stability declarations despite the dam not meeting international safety guidelines. Alleged deceptive acts include:
    • using laboratory data known by Vale to be deficient and unreliable to "meet" minimum safety factors;
    • deliberately concealing key information from auditors; and
    • replacing an auditor that raised concerns about the Brumadinho dam's previous stability declarations and its liquefaction risk.
Despite the alleged knowledge of the Brumadinho dam's critical safety issues, Vale made a number of statements in its SEC filings, sustainability reports, and other public disclosures to assure investors that its dams were safe and had been audited to address the risks of liquefaction, including, among others:
  • Public declarations vowing "Mariana Never Again" and declaring a "commitment to sustainability" and achieving "zero harm" to employees and surrounding communities.
  • Vale's 2016 Form 20-F and its Form 6-K dated May 30, 2017, as well as Vale's 2016 Sustainability Report issued in April 2017 and referenced within the SEC filings, stated that it had conducted extraordinary audits on the stability of its upstream dams and no abnormalities were identified.
  • Vale's 2017 Sustainability Report, issued in April 2018, included a number of statements continuing the safety narrative, such as claims that:
    • 100% of Vale's externally audited structures were certified to be in stable condition; and
    • Vale maintains the management of its dams in alignment with the "strictest international practices, standards of which exceed the legal requirements."
  • A December 2018 ESG webinar posted on Vale's website again proclaimed that Vale's dams were safe, were operating within normal limits, and had obtained stability declarations from external auditors.
By omitting that Vale knew the Brumadinho dam did not actually meet minimum international safety standards and that Vale had obtained the stability declarations from external auditors through multiple deceptive practices, the SEC alleged each of the above statements, among many others, were materially false and misleading.

Practical Implications

Since the administration change in January 2021, climate and ESG-related disclosures have become a focal point of the SEC. While the proposed rules mandating climate risk disclosure have garnered much of the attention recently (see Legal Update, SEC Proposes Mandatory Climate Disclosure Rules), the SEC previously established a Climate and ESG Task Force within the Division of Enforcement in March 2021 to ramp up enforcement efforts (see Legal Update, SEC Creates Climate and ESG Task Force in the Division of Enforcement). The task force is specifically mandated to identify material gaps or misstatements in ESG disclosures.
In the SEC's press release, Gurbir Grewal, Director of the Division of Enforcement, stated that "[m]any investors rely on ESG disclosures like those contained in Vale's annual Sustainability Reports and other public filings to make informed investment decisions. By allegedly manipulating those disclosures, Vale compounded the social and environmental harm caused by the Brumadinho dam's tragic collapse and undermined investors' ability to evaluate the risks posed by Vale's securities." Additionally, Melissa Hodgman, Associate Director of the Division of Enforcement, noted that "[w]hile allegedly concealing the environmental and economic risks posed by its dam, Vale misled investors and raised more than $1 billion in our debt markets while its securities actively traded on the NYSE."
The charges against Vale and statements from the Division of Enforcement serve as both:
  • An important reminder that ESG-related disclosures, including those made in voluntary sustainability reports and other formats outside of SEC filings, are being scrutinized for potential mispresentations to investors about the company's ESG efforts and performance (also sometimes referred to as greenwashing).
  • An indicatation that the SEC is more likely to consider ESG disclosure to be material to investment decisions and may be more aggressive in taking action against companies for their ESG disclosure.
Companies making voluntary ESG-related disclosure, whether in standalone sustainability reports or in SEC filings, should ensure they have proper oversight in place and consider extending their disclosure controls and procedures to cover such disclosure. For more information on ESG disclosure best practices, see Practice Note, Best Practices for Establishing ESG Disclosure Controls and Oversight.
For up-to-date information on other key developments regarding ESG and climate disclosure in the US, see Practice Note, Key Developments in ESG and Climate Disclosure Tracker. For a collection of Practical Law resources on ESG and corporate social responsibility (CSR), see Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Toolkit: US.