SANTA MONICA BRIEF ARGUES IN FAVOR OF ATM FEE RESTRICTIONS Bank of Am. v. City and County of San Francisco | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

SANTA MONICA BRIEF ARGUES IN FAVOR OF ATM FEE RESTRICTIONS Bank of Am. v. City and County of San Francisco | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, SANTA MONICA BRIEF ARGUES IN FAVOR OF ATM FEE RESTRICTIONS Bank of Am. v. City and County of San Francisco, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

SANTA MONICA BRIEF ARGUES IN FAVOR OF ATM FEE RESTRICTIONS Bank of Am. v. City and County of San Francisco

6 No. 7 ANBLLLR 4Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

SANTA MONICA BRIEF ARGUES IN FAVOR OF ATM FEE RESTRICTIONS Bank of Am. v. City and County of San Francisco

6 No. 7 ANBLLLR 4Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

6 No. 7 Andrews' Bank & Lender Liab. Litig. Rep. 4
Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter
November 30, 2000
ATMs
Copyright (c) 2000 Andrews Publications

SANTA MONICA BRIEF ARGUES IN FAVOR OF ATM FEE RESTRICTIONS

Bank of Am. v. City and County of San Francisco

The city of Santa Monica, Calif., has submitted its opening brief to the Ninth Circuit in support of challenged ordinances designed to prevent banks from charging noncustomers fees for ATM use. The plaintiff banks disagree, saying the ordinances are...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.