DEL. COURT: CONVERTIBLE-NOTE PROVISION DIDN'T TRIGGER CHANGE-OF-CONTROL RIGHT Angelo, Gordon & Co. v. Allied Riser Communications Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

DEL. COURT: CONVERTIBLE-NOTE PROVISION DIDN'T TRIGGER CHANGE-OF-CONTROL RIGHT Angelo, Gordon & Co. v. Allied Riser Communications Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, DEL. COURT: CONVERTIBLE-NOTE PROVISION DIDN'T TRIGGER CHANGE-OF-CONTROL RIGHT Angelo, Gordon & Co. v. Allied Riser Communications Corp., Secondary Sources
17 No. 10 Andrews Del. Corp. Litig. Rep. 6
Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter
December 9, 2002
Change-of-Control Provision:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

DEL. COURT: CONVERTIBLE-NOTE PROVISION DIDN'T TRIGGER CHANGE-OF-CONTROL RIGHT

Angelo, Gordon & Co. v. Allied Riser Communications Corp.

The indenture provision for convertible notes does not refer to “the same registered common stock” as stockholders got in the merger of the notes' issuer, Allied Riser Communications Corp., with a subsidiary of Cogent Communications Group Inc., Vice...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.