SUPREME COURT DENIES REVIEW OF 'ORIGINAL SOURCE' QUESTION U.S. ex rel. King v. Hillcrest Health Ctr. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

SUPREME COURT DENIES REVIEW OF 'ORIGINAL SOURCE' QUESTION U.S. ex rel. King v. Hillcrest Health Ctr. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, SUPREME COURT DENIES REVIEW OF 'ORIGINAL SOURCE' QUESTION U.S. ex rel. King v. Hillcrest Health Ctr., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

SUPREME COURT DENIES REVIEW OF 'ORIGINAL SOURCE' QUESTION U.S. ex rel. King v. Hillcrest Health Ctr.

7 No. 8 ANHCFLR 7Andrews Health Care Fraud Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

SUPREME COURT DENIES REVIEW OF 'ORIGINAL SOURCE' QUESTION U.S. ex rel. King v. Hillcrest Health Ctr.

7 No. 8 ANHCFLR 7Andrews Health Care Fraud Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

7 No. 8 Andrews Health Care Fraud Litig. Rep. 7
Andrews Health Care Fraud Litigation Reporter
April 2002
Original Source:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

SUPREME COURT DENIES REVIEW OF 'ORIGINAL SOURCE' QUESTION

U.S. ex rel. King v. Hillcrest Health Ctr.

The U.S. Supreme Court has let stand a decision blocking a physician from bringing a qui tam action against an Oklahoma health center because he was not the original source of the incriminating information. United States ex rel. King v. Hillcrest...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.