TIRE MAKER DENIES EMPLOYEE HARASSED AUTO PARTS STORE WORKER Walters v. AutoZone | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/Id3eb6bd053ec11dbbd2dfa5ce1d08a25/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default) View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, TIRE MAKER DENIES EMPLOYEE HARASSED AUTO PARTS STORE WORKER Walters v. AutoZone, Secondary Sources

Skip Page Header

TIRE MAKER DENIES EMPLOYEE HARASSED AUTO PARTS STORE WORKER Walters v. AutoZone

20 No. 26 ANEMPLR 9Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

Toggle Menu

TIRE MAKER DENIES EMPLOYEE HARASSED AUTO PARTS STORE WORKER Walters v. AutoZone

20 No. 26 ANEMPLR 9Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

20 No. 26 Andrews Employment Litig. Rep. 9

Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter

*1 July 18, 2006

Sexual Harassment

TIRE MAKER DENIES EMPLOYEE HARASSED AUTO PARTS STORE WORKER

Walters v. AutoZone

Briefs and Other Related Documents

Firestone Inc., named along with auto parts retailer AutoZone Inc. as a defendant in a sexual-harassment lawsuit, has denied that one of its employees sexually harassed the plaintiff while she worked in an Alabama AutoZone store.

Walters v. AutoZone...

Briefs and Other Related Documents (Back to Top)

(Complaint), Trial Pleading (June 08, 2006)

(Answer & Defenses of Firestone to Plaintiff's Complaint), Trial Pleading (July 03, 2006)

(Defendant AutoZone's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint), Trial Pleading (June 29, 2006)

End of Document