CFTC Issues No-Action Relief on Dealer-to-Dealer Margin Segregation | Practical Law

CFTC Issues No-Action Relief on Dealer-to-Dealer Margin Segregation | Practical Law

The CFTC issued no-action relief to swap dealers that did not meet the September 1, 2016 deadline for compliance with interdealer initial margin segregation rules for uncleared swaps. The relief expires on October 3, 2016.

CFTC Issues No-Action Relief on Dealer-to-Dealer Margin Segregation

Practical Law Legal Update w-003-3248 (Approx. 5 pages)

CFTC Issues No-Action Relief on Dealer-to-Dealer Margin Segregation

by Practical Law Finance
Published on 05 Sep 2016USA (National/Federal)
The CFTC issued no-action relief to swap dealers that did not meet the September 1, 2016 deadline for compliance with interdealer initial margin segregation rules for uncleared swaps. The relief expires on October 3, 2016.
On September 1, 2016, the CFTC issued No-Action Letter 16-70 (No-Action 16-70), granting relief to swap dealers (SDs) that failed to meet the September 1, 2016 deadline (Phase-one date) for compliance with initial margin (IM) segregation rules for uncleared swaps between large dealer parties.
Specifically, the CFTC has granted relief from the requirement under CFTC Regulation 23.157 that IM posted to or collected from a counterparty by an SD be held by an unaffiliated third-party custodian. The CFTC will give SDs subject to IM regulations until October 3, 2016 before assessing penalties and initiating enforcement actions against parties for noncompliance.
This delay was requested by banking and finance industry groups ISDA and SIFMA. The request came after ISDA and SIFMA found that a majority of SDs would not have all the necessary documentation and supporting infrastructure in place by the Phase-one date.
Under the terms of No-Action 16-70, the CFTC will not recommend enforcement action against SDs that have not:
  • Required that IM amounts collected from, or posted to, a counterparty be held by an independent third-party custodian.
  • Entered into an agreement with a custodian holding the IM amounts.
The CFTC no-action recommendation is subject to certain conditions. Namely, SDs subject to Phase-one date IM regulations are required to:
  • Collect and post IM and variation margin amounts calculated in accordance with CFTC uncleared swaps rules.
  • Hold IM collected from other SDs subject to the Phase-one date IM requirements in accordance with their existing arrangements as of September 1, 2016.
  • Comply with the restrictions set forth in CFTC Regulation 23.157(c)(1), which prohibits a custodian from rehypothecating, repledging, reusing or otherwise transferring derivatives margin collateral held by the custodian with respect to IM amounts collected from other SDs that are subject to the Phase-one date IM requirements.
  • Immediately comply with CFTC Regulation 23.157 with respect to a counterparty that is subject to the Phase-one date IM requirements that has implemented the necessary custodial agreements and completed testing of its custodial infrastructure.
IM exchange was required beginning on September 1, 2016 for a covered swap entered into by a covered swap entity, or CSE (that is, an entity subject to the rules – in most cases, an SD), where both (i) the CSE combined with all its affiliates and (ii) its counterparty combined with all its affiliates have an average daily aggregate notional amount (AANA) of covered swaps outstanding for March, April, and May of 2016 that exceeds $3 trillion. The initial IM Phase-one date was therefore designed to capture only transactions between the largest SDs.
The compliance dates for IM exchange between various types of counterparties range from September 1, 2016, to September 1, 2020, depending on the AANA of uncleared swaps, foreign exchange (FX) forwards, and FX swaps of the CSE and its counterparty for each business day in March, April, and May of that year (see Practice Note, The Dodd-Frank Act: Margin Posting and Collection Rules for Uncleared Swaps Compliance Dates for Initial Margin Requirements).
The phase-in schedule for the CFTC's IM requirements were to be in line with cross-border harmonization efforts in this area and consistent with the September 2013 Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions international framework (see Practice Note, The Dodd-Frank Act: Margin Posting and Collection Rules for Uncleared Swaps: Final BCBS/IOSCO Guidelines on Uncleared Swap Margin Collateral).
However, IM requirements have been delayed by other regulators, including the EU, Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia (see Legal Update, EU Delays Margin Rules for Uncleared Swaps). It is important to note that similar relief was not granted by US prudential bank regulators for corollary US margin rules on margin for uncleared swaps (prudential margin rules).
This creates a discrepancy that could provide a pricing arbitrage opportunity for uncleared products over the next month between CFTC-regulated SDs and prudentially regulated SDs, as it is less costly to enter into a swap that is not subject to the segregation requirements under CFTC Regulation 23.157.
These delays have led to concerns by market participants over the market dislocations in regulatory requirements. Banks in Europe, Singapore, Hong Kong and Australia have temporarily ceased trading with registered SDs subject to IM regulations over concerns of posting collateral. This is in part because the CFTC has adopted a final rule on the cross-border application of the its margin rules. The final rule utilizes the concept of "Foreign Consolidated Subsidiary" (FCS) to delineate when the margin rules apply in the absence of a US guaranty.
FCS are non-US nonbank swap entities (referred to as CSEs in the rule) whose obligations under the relevant swap are not guaranteed by a US person, but whose financial statements are included in those of a US ultimate parent entity. FCS are not entitled to an exclusion from CFTC uncleared swaps margin rules (see Practice Note, the Dodd-Frank Act: Margin Posting and Collection Rules for Uncleared Swaps: Cross-Border Transactions Under the Prudential Rules).
Note that ISDA has developed several products to aid regulated parties with their margin compliance documentation, see Legal Update, ISDA and IHS Markit Launch ISDA Amend 2.0 to Assist with Margin Compliance and Resolution Stay.
For more information on US margin regulations for uncleared swaps, see Practice Note, The Dodd-Frank Act: Margin Posting and Collection Rules for Uncleared Swaps.
For information on calculating margin using the ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM™) and updating credit support documentation, see Practice Note, The New ISDA® Credit Support Annexes and Global Margin Compliance for Uncleared Swaps: The ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM™).
"ISDA" and "ISDA SIMM" are registered trademarks of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA). ISDA is not a sponsor of Practical Law and had no part in the development of this resource.