FLA. JUDGE IS FIRST TO INTERPRET KEY PART OF ‘INSURED VS. INSURED’ EXCLUSION Sphinx Int'l v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

FLA. JUDGE IS FIRST TO INTERPRET KEY PART OF ‘INSURED VS. INSURED’ EXCLUSION Sphinx Int'l v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, FLA. JUDGE IS FIRST TO INTERPRET KEY PART OF ‘INSURED VS. INSURED’ EXCLUSION Sphinx Int'l v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

FLA. JUDGE IS FIRST TO INTERPRET KEY PART OF ‘INSURED VS. INSURED’ EXCLUSION Sphinx Int'l v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh

18 No. 5 ANCODLLR 3Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

FLA. JUDGE IS FIRST TO INTERPRET KEY PART OF ‘INSURED VS. INSURED’ EXCLUSION Sphinx Int'l v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh

18 No. 5 ANCODLLR 3Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

18 No. 5 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 3
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
September 23, 2002
D&O Insurance (Insured vs. Insured):
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

FLA. JUDGE IS FIRST TO INTERPRET KEY PART OF ‘INSURED VS. INSURED’ EXCLUSION

Sphinx Int'l v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh

Briefs and Other Related Documents
A federal judge in Orlando, Fla., appears to be the first to interpret a key phrase in the commonly used “insured vs. insured” exclusion in directors and officers insurance policies. He found that Genesis Indemnity Insurance Co. has no duty to pay...
Briefs and Other Related Documents (Back to Top)
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.