WAL-MART DIDN'T BREACH PHARMACIST'S RIGHT TO REFUSE BIRTH CONTROL SCRIPTS Noesen v. Med. Staffing Network | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

WAL-MART DIDN'T BREACH PHARMACIST'S RIGHT TO REFUSE BIRTH CONTROL SCRIPTS Noesen v. Med. Staffing Network | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, WAL-MART DIDN'T BREACH PHARMACIST'S RIGHT TO REFUSE BIRTH CONTROL SCRIPTS Noesen v. Med. Staffing Network, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

WAL-MART DIDN'T BREACH PHARMACIST'S RIGHT TO REFUSE BIRTH CONTROL SCRIPTS Noesen v. Med. Staffing Network

22 No. 5 ANPHARLR 10Andrews Pharmaceutical Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

WAL-MART DIDN'T BREACH PHARMACIST'S RIGHT TO REFUSE BIRTH CONTROL SCRIPTS Noesen v. Med. Staffing Network

22 No. 5 ANPHARLR 10Andrews Pharmaceutical Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

22 No. 5 Andrews Pharmaceutical Litig. Rep. 10
Andrews Pharmaceutical Litigation Reporter
*1 June 29, 2006
Religious Discrimination
Copyright © 2006 Thomson/West .

WAL-MART DIDN'T BREACH PHARMACIST'S RIGHT TO REFUSE BIRTH CONTROL SCRIPTS

Noesen v. Med. Staffing Network

Wal-Mart did not violate a pharmacist's civil rights when it fired him for refusing on religious grounds to fill prescriptions for contraceptives, a federal judge in Madison, Wis., has ruled.
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.