NO COVERAGE FOR DAMAGES AT AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY, CALIF. CT. RULES Tosco Corp. v. General Ins. Co. of Am. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

NO COVERAGE FOR DAMAGES AT AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY, CALIF. CT. RULES Tosco Corp. v. General Ins. Co. of Am. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, NO COVERAGE FOR DAMAGES AT AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY, CALIF. CT. RULES Tosco Corp. v. General Ins. Co. of Am., Secondary Sources
21 No. 7 Andrews Hazardous Waste Litig. Rep. 6
Andrews Hazardous Waste Litigation Reporter
February 16, 2001
Insurance
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

NO COVERAGE FOR DAMAGES AT AFTER-ACQUIRED PROPERTY, CALIF. CT. RULES

Tosco Corp. v. General Ins. Co. of Am.

The California Court of Appeal has held that a liability carrier cannot be required to defend or idemnify insureds for liabilities arising from property that was not owned during the relevant policy period. The court indicated that coverage for an...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.